ESTHETIC QUALITY OF THE SMILE ACCORDING TO ESTHETIC FACTORS IN THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY IN 2019

Huynh Minh Ngoc Nguyen 1,, Trong Tinh Nguyen 1, Van Anh Nguyen 1, Huu Trang Thanh Huynh1, Nguyen Phuong Uyen Truong1, Thanh Dat Mai 1, Hai Dang Pham 1, Thi Thao Do 1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: A number of reference patterns have been studied in different populations. Determining the frequency of different smile aesthetic parameters in Vietnamese population and exploring possible gender differences are important factors for obtaining predictable treatment outcomes. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the parameter of the four esthetic factors of smile: Smile line, smile arc, upper lip curvature and number of teeth displayed in the smile following sex and valuating the esthetic quality of the smile according to esthetic factors type. Materials and methods: Digital images of natural smiles on 100 freshman students in 2018-2019 (58 male and 42 female) Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy were recorded Sofware (Adobe Photoshop 7.0.1) was used to process images. We choose 50 students of the Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology and 50 other students to evaluate the level of esthetics of the chosen smiles by 5 levels not Very beautiful, not beautiful, Normal, Nice, Very beautiful and compare the differences in opinions of these two groups. Results: Aesthetic distribution of smiles by gender: (n male=58, n female=42). The figure for male shows that the most popular smile line is high smile line (type 2) accounting for the percentage of 50%, which is different from female, where the most popular is average smile line (50%). In both male and female, consonant smile arch accounted for the highest proportion 46.6% and 61.9%, respectively. The most common type of male upper lip curve is straight (41.4%). While this figure in women is the upward curvature. There are similarities in the evaluation of both groups of students: Smile with the upper lip curve straight upper lip lines is considered as the most beautiful smile. Conclusion: The study has provided some data on aesthetic distribution of smiles on Vietnamese people aged 18 to 25 and has also shown that students of Odonto-Stomatology have more rigorous assessment of the smile aesthetic than the others.

Article Details

References

1. Hoàng Tử Hùng, Phạm Thị Hương Loan (2000), “Nghiên Cứu Đặc Điểm Hình Thái Cung Răng Người Việt - So Sánh Với Người Ấn Độ Và Trung Quốc”, Tuyển Tập Công Trình Nghiên Cứu Khoa Học, tr.95-105.
2. Nguyễn Thị Bích Lý (1999), Phân Loại Các Kiểu Cười, Cập Nhật Nha Khoa, tr.28-32.
3. Trần Thị Nguyên Ny (2004), “Đường cười trên 90 sinh viên Đại học Y Dược TP. Hồ Chí Minh”, Tiểu luận tốt nghiệp Bác sĩ Răng Hàm Mặt, tr.36-44.
4. Nguyễn Bích Vân (2004), Tạo Thẩm Mỹ Nướu, Cập Nhật Nha Khoa, tr.17-25.
5. C. McLeod, H. W. Fields, F. Hechter, W. Wiltshire, W. Rody Jr. and J. Christensen (2011), Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons: a comparison of Canadian and US data, The Angle Orthodontist, pp.198-205.
6. C. Pinzan-Vercelino, M. C. Ferreira, F. S. Bramante (2020), Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople, J Prosthet Dent, pp.314-321.
7. Liébart M.F., Borghetti A., Monnet-Corti (2004), Smile Line and Priodontum Visibility,Vol.1, pp.17-25.
8. N. Talic, S. Alomar, and A. Almaidhan (2013), Perception of Saudi dentists and lay people to altered smile esthetics, Saudi Dental Journal, pp.13-21.
9. Rajesh Balani, Upendra Jain, Amitabh Kallury, Gurmukh Singh (2014), Evaluation of smile esthetics in Central India, APOS Trends in Orthodontics, pp.162-168.
10. Stefano Del Monte, Kelvin I Afrashtehfar (2017), Lay preferences for dentogingival esthetic parameters: A systematic review, J Prosthet Dent, pp.717-724.
11. Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. (2003), Dynamic smile visualization and quantification, Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture, part 1, pp.4-12.