MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL INVASION AND REGIONAL LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN RECTAL CANCER PATIENTS AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: In the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer, pretreatment staging plays an important role in risk stratification and in planning an individualized treatment strategy for each patient. Objective: To investigate the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in the assessment of local tumor invasion and regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 44 patients with rectal cancer at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital. Results: Exophytic tumors accounted for 84.1% of cases, and all tumors were adenocarcinomas. Poorly differentiated tumors accounted for 63.6%. On histopathology, most cases were classified as T4 local invasion (56.8%) and N2 regional lymph node metastasis (56.8%). Tumors were most commonly located in the lower third of the rectum (43.2%) and were predominantly below the peritoneal reflection (52.3%). On magnetic resonance imaging, most tumors showed semicircumferential involvement (90.9%), intermediate signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging (84.1%), heterogeneous signal intensity (90.9%), and high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging (90.9%). The mean tumor length was 52.89 ± 20.02 mm, and the mean tumor thickness was 16.38 ± 7.27 mm. Most cases were assessed as T4 local invasion (61.4%) and N2 regional lymph node metastasis (56.8%) on magnetic resonance imaging. Mesorectal fascia positivity was observed in 81.8% of patients. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable noninvasive imaging modality for rectal cancer staging. It enables assessment of the extent of local tumor invasion, regional lymph node metastasis, and mesorectal fascia involvement, thereby supporting pretreatment staging, risk stratification, and individualized treatment planning.
Keywords
Magnetic resonance imaging, rectal cancer, local invasion, regional lymph node metastasis
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
2. Fernández-Esparrach G, Ayuso-Colella JR, Sendino O, et al. EUS and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer: a prospective and comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011. 74(2), 347-354. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1257
3. Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Springer; 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3
4. Đinh Văn Tập, Trịnh Tuấn Dương, Đặng Quốc Ái. Đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng của ung thư trực tràng thấp tại Bệnh viện Thanh Nhàn và Bệnh viện E. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024. 536(1B), 129-133. doi:10.51298/vmj.v536i1B.8783
5. Huang LY, Xu Y, Cai GX, et al. S100A4 over-expression underlies lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2011. 17(1), 69-78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.69.
6. Wijenayake W, Perera M, Balawardena J, et al. Proximal and distal rectal cancers differ in curative resectability and local recurrence. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2011. 3(8), 113-118. doi:10.4240/wjgs.v3.i8.113
7. Hodges N, Battersby N, Rao S, Brown G, et al. Relationship Between Baseline Rectal Tumor Length and Magnetic Resonance Tumor Regression Grade Response to Chemoradiotherapy: A Subanalysis of the TRIGGER Feasibility Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. 30(8), 4729-4735. doi:10.1245/s10434-022-11914-5
8. Horvat N, Carlos Tavares Rocha C, Clemente Oliveira B, et al. MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management. Radiographics. 2019. 39(2), 367-387. doi:10.1148/rg.2019180114
9. Nguyễn Thị Tuyền, Lâm Vĩnh Niên, Nguyễn Văn Thanh và cộng sự. Đặc điểm giải phẫu bệnh của ung thư biểu mô đại trực tràng tại Bệnh viện Ung Bướu Đà Nẵng. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021. 509(2), 45-50. doi:10.51298/vmj.v509i2.1790.