Article Sidebar

PDF
Issue: No. 91 (2025)
Section: Article
DOI: 10.58490/ctump.2025i91.4030
Date Published: 25/09/2025
Views 0
Downloads 0
How to Cite
Ho, D. T. V., Nguyen, T. N. Q., & Pham, N. H. (2025). EVALUATION OF THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SCALE TO ASSESS KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION OF NURSING STUDENTS. Cantho Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, 91, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2025i91.4030

EVALUATION OF THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SCALE TO ASSESS KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION OF NURSING STUDENTS

Dang Tuong Vy Ho1, , Thi Nhu Quynh Nguyen1, Ngoc Ha Pham1
1 School of Nursing and Medical Technology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: The rapid development of artificial intelligence demands innovation in modern education and healthcare, especially for nursing students, who are among the core forces in the healthcare system. This study evaluates the validity and reliability of a scale designed to assess nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in applying artificial intelligence to their education. Objectives: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the scale assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the application of artificial intelligence in education of nursing students. Materials and methods: The study employed the scale “Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards artificial intelligence among health professions’ students in Jordan” developed by Walid AlQerem (2023). The scale was translated into Vietnamese and its content validity was evaluated by five experts in the fields of nursing and information technology. Results: The the scale assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the application of artificial intelligence in education of nursing students demonstrated item-level content validity index (I-CVI) values of 0.8 or higher, a scale-level content validity index average (S-CVI/Ave) of 0.83 or higher, and a universal agreement (S-CVI/UA) of 0.97 for clarity, comprehensibility, and applicability. The reliability coefficient of the knowledge, attitude, and practice subscales was 0.71, 0.83 and 0.84, respectively, while the barrier subscale showed a reliability of 0.82. Conclusions: The scale demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability and is suitable for assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the application of artificial intelligence in the learning of nursing students in Vietnam.  

Keywords

Scale, Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, Validity, Reliability

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

1. Bùi Trọng Tài, Nguyễn Minh Tuấn. Nghiên cứu ảnh hưởng của trí tuệ nhân tạo trong giáo dục tới hoạt động học tập của sinh viên. Tạp chí Giáo dục. 2024. 24(10), 6-11, https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/1863.
2. Weixi Li. The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on the Education System. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. 2024(65), 137-42, doi: doi.org/10.54254/27537048/65/20240158.
3. Đại hoc Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. Quyết định số 6868/QĐ-ĐHYD ngày 04/11/2024 ban hành Quy định sử dụng trí tuệ nhân tạo (AI) trong các hoạt động tại Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2024.
4. Aya S. Khater, Ayman A. Zaaqoq, Maha M. Wahdan, Soha Ashry. Knowledge and Attitude of Ain Shams University Medical Students towards Artificial Intelligence and its Application in Medical Education and Practice. Educational Research and Innovation Journal. 2023. 3(10), 29-42, doi: 10.21608/erji.2023.306718.
5. Deepshikha Yadav, Poonam Jaiswal, Neha Kumari, Ishan Jemini, Yojna Verma, Dr.Shourya Tandon, et al. Knowledge, Attitude, And Practice Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI) And Its Usage In Dental Academics Curriculum Among Dental Undergraduates And Postgraduates. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2024. 10(7), doi: doi.org/10.36713/epra17709.
6. Samer A. Kharroubi, ImanTannir, RashaAbu El Hassan, RoubaBallout. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices toward Artificial Intelligence among University Students in Lebanon. Education Sciences. 2024. 14(8), 863, doi:10.3390/educsci14080863.
7. Sanjeev Khanagar, Mohammad Alkathiri, RakanAlhamlan, Khalid Alyami, Majed Alhejazi, Ahmed Alghamdi. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of dental students towards artificial intelligence inRiyadh, Saudi Arabia. Medical Science. 2021, 25(114), 1857-1865.
8. Walid Al-Qerem, Judith Eberhardt, Anan Jarab, Abdel Qader Al Bawab, Alaa Hammad, Fawaz Alasmari, et al. Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards artificial intelligence among health professions' students in Jordan. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2023. 23(1), 288, doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02403-0.
9. Dorcas E. Beaton, Claire Bombardier, Francis Guillemin, Marcos Bosi Ferraz. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000. 25(24), 3186-3191, doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
10. Richard H. Browne. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med. 1995. 14(17), 1933-1940, doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141709.
11. Denise F Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck, Steven V Owen. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007. 30(4), 459-467. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.
12. Mary R. Lynn. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986. 35(6), 382-385.
13. Jum Nunnally, Ira Bernstein. Psychometric Theory (3rd ed). 1994, 303-305.