EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES FOR CLOSED HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES USING LOCKING PLATES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The advancement of medicine has provided various methods of bone fixation for the treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures, such as plating and intramedullary nailing. Although intramedullary nailing is less invasive, the high rate of non-union makes plating the gold standard. Locking plates, which allow the use of both conventional and locking screws, provide stability and minimize complications while also enabling early mobilization for patients. Objectives: To describe general characteristics and evaluation of treatment outcomes for closed humeral shaft fractures using locking plates at Can Tho Central General Hospital. Materials and methods: Prospective clinical intervention study without a control group in 31 patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral closed humeral shaft fractures and indicated for surgical bone fixation using locking plates. Results: Among the 31 patients studied, the most common age group was 16-40 years, with the majority being farmers, accounting for 29%. Patients with type A fractures in the middle third, according to the AO classification, made up the highest percentage at 48.4%. Regarding fracture reduction outcomes, the highest percentage, 96.8%, achieved excellent bone union results; there were no patients with average or poor union outcomes. In terms of shoulder and elbow joint functional recovery, 96.8% of patients achieved excellent recovery, with no average or poor results. Six months after surgery, patients had normal shoulder and elbow joint movement. Conclusions: Surgical bone fixation using locking plates is a safe and effective treatment for closed humeral shaft fractures and provides good outcomes.
Keywords
Closed humeral shaft fracture, locking plate, patients
Article Details
References
2. Beverly, M. and D.W. Murray. Walking on water: subchondral vascular physiology explains how joints work and why they become osteoarthritic. EFORT Open Rev. 2023. 8(6), 436-442.
3. Kim, J.W., et al., A Prospective Randomized Study of Operative Treatment for Noncomminuted Humeral Shaft Fractures: Conventional Open Plating Versus Minimal Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2015. 29(4), 189-194.
4. Phan Quang Trí. Phác đồ điều trị gãy thân xương cánh tay. Phác đồ điều trị của Bệnh viện Chấn Thương Chỉnh Hình Phần Một, Giáo Dục Việt Nam, Hồ Chí Minh, 207-210.
5. Nguyễn Anh Tuấn, Nguyễn Quang Long. Sử dụng nẹp tổ hợp các-bon (C3) điều trị gãy thân xương cánh tay. Y Học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2003. 7 (1), 6-9.
6. Angela Christine Chang, et al. The modified anterolateral approoach. Journal of Orthopeadic Surgery. 2019. 27 (3), 1-5, doi: 10.1177/2309499019865954.
7. Sebastian Lotzien, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral midshaft fracture:
anterior versus posterior plate fixation. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. 20 (1), doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2807-3.
8. Rebekah Belayneh, et al. Final outcomes of radial nerve palsy assiociated wit humeral shaft fracture and nonunion. J Orthop Traumatol. 20 (1), 18. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0526-2.
9. Seyed Mahdi, et al. Humeral shaft fracture: a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative versus operative management (plate fixation). Orthopedic Research and Reviews. 2019. 11, 141-147. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S212998.
10. Đỗ Đức Bình. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật điều trị gãy kín đầu trên xương cánh tay bằng nẹp khóa tại Bệnh viện Quân Y 103. Kỷ yếu Hội Nghị Khoa Học Thường Niên Hội Chấn Thương Chỉnh Hình Việt Nam lần thứ XVII. 2018. 90, doi: 10.51298/vmj.v529i1B.6413.
11. Jae-Jung Jeong, et al. Narrow locking compression plate vs long philos plate for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of spiral humerus shaft fracture. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. 20, doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2697-8.