CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS, X-RAY FEATURES, AND EVALUATION OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR EXTRACTION OF CLASS II ACCORDING TO PARANT USING PIEZOTOME AND SLOW-SPEED HANDPIECE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Impacted wisdom teeth often present with numerous complex symptoms and complications. Currently, in Vietnam, there has been no research comparing the outcomes of surgical removal of impacted lower wisdom teeth classified as Parant II using either a slow-speed handpiece or the Piezotome ultrasonic device. Objective: To describe the clinical and radiographic characteristics and to evaluate the surgical outcomes of impacted lower wisdom teeth classified as Parant II using the Piezotome device and the slow-speed handpiece in patients at Vung Tau Hospital during 2023-2024. Materials and methods: A controlled clinical intervention study was conducted on 102 patients who underwent mandibular third molar extractions classified as Class II according to Parant at Vung Tau Hospital, evenly divided into two groups. Results: According to the Parant II classification, type A accounted for 44.1%, type B for 34.3%, type D for 18.6%, and only 2.9% were type C. For the Pell-Gregory classification regarding depth, type A was predominant (75.5%), with type I (28.4%), type II (47.1%), and type III (24.5%) for width. Postoperative outcomes indicated that the levels of pain, swelling, and bleeding on the 1st and 3rd days were significantly improved in the Piezotome group, and by the 7th day, most patients in both groups experienced no pain, swelling, or bleeding. Furthermore, the incidence of complications and soft tissue injury during surgery was lower in patients treated with the Piezotome device. Conclusion: Most patients with impacted lower wisdom teeth had favorable positions for surgery. The use of the Piezotome device demonstrated several advantages over the slow-speed handpiece in reducing surgical complications and improving symptoms of swelling, pain, and bleeding in the initial postoperative days.
Article Details
Keywords
tooth extraction, impacted lower wisdom teeth, mandible, Piezotome, slowspeed handpiece
References
2. Momin, M., Albright, T., Leikin, J., Miloro, M., & Markiewicz, M. R. Patient morbidity among residents extracting third molars: does experience matter?. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2018. 125(5), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.006.
3. Eltayeb, A. S., Karrar, M. A., & Elbeshir, E. I. Orbital Subperiosteal Abscess Associated with Mandibular Wisdom Tooth Infection: A Case Report. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery. 2019. 18(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1074-z.
4. Vũ Anh Dũng. Bài 11. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật răng 8 hàm dưới mọc lệch, mọc ngầm sử dụng tay khoan phẫu thuật chếch góc tại Bệnh viện Đại học Y Thái Bình. Tạp chí Y Dược Thái Bình. 2021. 64-68. 5. Nguyễn Quang Khải, Nguyễn Phú Thắng. Điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng răng khôn hàm dưới mọc lệch theo Parant II. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2022. 520(2), 225-228. doi:https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v520i2.4173.
6. Menziletoglu D, Basturk F, Isik BK, Esen A. A prospective split-mouth clinical study:
comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020. 24(1), 51-55. doi:10.1007/s10006-019-00817-7.
7. Sortino, F., Pedullà, E., & Masoli, V. The piezoelectric and rotatory osteotomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: comparison of postoperative recovery. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2008. 66(12), 2444–2448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.004.
8. Kim Ngọc Khánh Vinh, Trần Thị Phương Đan, Lâm Nhựt Tân. Đặc điểm lâm sàng và cận lâm sàng răng khôn hàm dưới liên quan thần kinh răng dưới trong phẫu thuật cắt thân răng. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2023. (64), 118-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2023i64.1262.
9. Nguyễn Hồng Lợi, Nguyễn Đình Hòa. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nhổ răng khôn hàm dưới lệch ngầm có sử dụng máy phẫu thuật siêu âm. Tạp chí Y học lâm sàng Bệnh viện Trung ương Huế. 2023. 84130-138, doi:10.38103/jcmhch.84.18.
10. Sharma, A. K., Gupta, A., Pabari, H. P., Pathak, S. K., Odedra, N. H., Beniwal, J., & Arora, K. S. Comparative and clinical evaluation between piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction. National journal of maxillofacial surgery. 2023. 14(2), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_333_21.
11. Civak, T., Ustun, T., Yilmaz, H. N., & Gursoy, B. Postoperative evaluation of Er:YAG laser, piezosurgery, and rotary systems used for osteotomy in mandibular third-molar extractions. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for CranioMaxillo-Facial Surgery. 2021. 49(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.11.010.