THE EVALUATION RESULTS OF TONSILLECTOMY METHOD WITH MONOPOLAR ELECTROCAUTERY AT CAN THO CENTRAL GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2022-2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Chronic tonsillitis is one of the common diseases in otorhinolaryngology but it is still a remarkable issue currently and tonsillectomy is among the most often performed operations. At Can Tho Central General Hospital, tonsillectomy method with monopolar electrocautery is choice in the most tonsillectomy surgery. To objectively evaluate advantages and disadvantages of tonsillectomy method with monopolar electrocautery, it is necessary to consider clinical results of treatment. Objectives: 1). To determine clinical characteristics of chronic tonsillitis patients who were used monopolar electrocautery for tonsillectomy at Can Tho Central General Hospital in 2022 – 2024; 2). To evaluate the results of using monopolar electrocautery for tonsillectomy at Can Tho Central General Hospital in 2022 - 2024. Materials and methods: Cross – sectional descriptive and prospective study on 86 adult patients who were diagnosed with chronic tonsillitis and used monopolar electrocautery for tonsillectomy at Can Tho Central General Hospital from June 2022 to March 2024. Result: 86 patients included males (44.18%) and females (55.82%); mean age was 28.13 ± 7.95. The rate of tonsil hypertrophy was 80,23%. The number of grade II tonsil hypertrophy cases was 37/86 cases. Intraoperative estimated blood loss was 5.43 ± 2.92 mL. Complications after surgery only met 2.33% of late bleeding. At week 2, postoperatively, the pain was 0.05 ± 0.21 pain score. The average time of returning activities was 8.24 ± 1.51 days. Conclusion: Advantages of tonsillectomy by monopolar electrocautery: less blood loss, less pain after surgery, and short recovery time. The tonsillectomy method with monopolar electrocautery gives good results.
Keywords
chronic tonsillitis, tonsillectomy, monopolar electrocautery
Article Details
References
10.22038/IJORL.2021.56901.2961.
2. Subasi B, Oghan F, Tasli H, Akbal S, Karaman NE. Comparison of three tonsillectomy techniques in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021. 278(6), 2011 - 2015. Doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06299-8.
3. Huỳnh Thị Kim Cương. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và đánh giá kết quả cắt amiđan viêm mạn tính bằng dao điện lưỡng cực tại Bệnh viện Tai Mũi Họng và Bệnh viện Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ năm 2018 – 2019. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2019. 19, 164 – 179.
4. Lê Văn Huyên, Phạm Thị Bích Đào, Trần Văn Tâm, Mai Thị Mai Phương. Nghiên cứu thay đổi giọng nói ở bệnh nhân sau cắt amiđan. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021. 502(2), 203 - 207.
5. Lou Z. A comparison of coblation and modified monopolar tonsillectomy in adults. BMC Surg. 2023. 23(1), 141. Doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02035-1.
6. Nguyễn Quỳnh Anh, Khưu Minh Thái. So sánh kết quả điều trị của phẫu thuật cắt amidan bằng dao plasma với cắt amidan kinh điển tại Bệnh Viện Tai Mũi Họng Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh năm 2020. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2022. 515 (2), 129 - 135.
7. Tạ Hùng Sơn, Vũ Văn Sản. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật cắt amiđan bằng dao Ligasure tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa Quốc tế Hải Phòng. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021. 503(6), 136 - 141.
8. Yun JH, Jang JY, Shin YS, Kim HJ, Kim CH, Park DY. Effect of monopolar diathermy power settings on postoperative pain, wound healing, and tissue damage after tonsillectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2024. 14(1), 267. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50633-z.
9. Tan A, Ganhasan S, Lu P, Yuen HW, Loh I, et al. PEAK PlasmaBlade versus monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy in adults: A prospective double - blinded randomized controlled trial. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019. 40(4), 478-481. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.03.011.
10. Nguyễn Phương Thảo, Nguyễn Quang Trung. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật cắt amidan bằng dao Ligasure. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2020. 496(2), 179 - 182.