VALUE OF STRAIN ELASTOGRAPHY ULTRASOUND IN DIFFERENTIATION OF BREAST MASSES

Quach Tran Tran Pham1,, Vu Dang Nguyen1, Dung Tien Doan1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Breast screening and diagnostic breast imaging provides early diagnosis of breast cancer. Although breast imaging modalities have high sensitivity rates, there is still need for a higher specificity in imaging to rule out malignancy in incidentally found breast lesions. Elastography is a promising ultrasonographic technique which is used to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions based on the stiffness of the lesion. Objectives: To evaluate the performance and value of strain elastography in breast lesions, with pathologic diagnosis from ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy as the gold standard. Materials and methods: A transverse study involving 59 patients with 61 lesions who were classified BIRADS from 3 to 5 after underwent both strain elastography and B-mode ultrasound, and had histopathologic results at Can Tho Oncology Hospital from December 2022 to April 2024. Results: 59 patients aged 47.21.9 years, included 26 benign and 35 maglinant lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative  predictive value, accuracy for the B-mode ultrasound were 97%, 62%, 77%, 94%, 82%. Strain elastography combined with B-mode ultrasound, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy were 97%, 77%, 85%, 95%, 89%. Conclusion: Strain elastography combined with B-mode ultrasound were more effective than conventional ultrasound for distinguishing maglinant from benign breast lesion.

Article Details

References

1. Ferlay J., Colombet M., Soerjomataram I., Parkin D.M., Piñeros M., et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. International journal of cancer. 2021. 149(4), 778-89, doi:10.1002/ijc.33588.
2. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 2013. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Bi-Rads.
3. Richard G.B., Kazutama N., Dominique A., David C., Andre F., et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 2: breast. Ultrasound in medicine & biology. 2015. 41(5), 1148-1160, doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.008.
4. Sinha D., Sharma S., Kundaragi G.N., Kale S.K. Added value of strain elastography in the characterisation of breast lesions: A prospective study. Ultrasound. 2020. 28(3), 164-173, doi:10.1177/1742271X20912762.
5. Nguyễn Thị Thu Thảo, Lưu Hồng Nhung, Vũ Đăng Lưu, Phạm Minh Thông. Nghiên cứu giá trị chẩn đoán ung thư vú của siêu âm mode B và siêu âm đàn hồi mô-Strain elastography. Tạp chí Điện quang & Y học hạt nhân Việt Nam. 2018. (32), 4-10, doi:10.55046/vjrnm.32.529.2018. 6. Nguyễn Thị Huyền, Nguyễn Thu Hương, Phạm Minh Thông. Đánh giá giá trị chẩn đoán ung thư vú của siêu âm đàn hồi nén và sóng biến dạng. Tạp chí Điện quang & Y học hạt nhân Việt Nam. 2022. (39), 4-10, doi:10.55046/vjrnm.39.175.2020.
7. Richard G.B., Annalisa D.S., Valeria S., Federica M., Chiara R., et al. Diagnostic performance and accuracy of the 3 interpreting methods of breast strain elastography: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2019. 38(6), 1397-1404, doi:10.1002/jum.14849.
8. Richard G.B. Breast elastography. Tissue Elasticity Imaging. 2020. 21-46, doi:10.1016/B9780-12-809662-8.00002-4.
9. Jasmine Thanh Xuân, Phan Thanh Hải. Nghiên cứu so sánh siêu âm đàn hồi Strain elastography (SE) so với Shearwave elastography (SWE) trong bệnh lý u vú nữ tại Medic TPHCM 2019. Tạp chí Điện quang & Y học hạt nhân Việt Nam. 2020. (37), 40-51, doi:10.55046/vjrnm.37.150.2020.
10. WanRu J., Ting L., YiJie D., XiaoXiao Z., WeiWei Z., et al. Breast elasticity imaging techniques:
comparison of strain elastography and shear-wave elastography in the same population. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2021. 47(1), 104-113, doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.022.