EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL RESULTS OF LASER DIODE 810 NM IN THE ENDODONTIC TREATMENT OF SINGLE-ROOTED TEETH
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Endodontic treatment is essentially an antiseptic process. Objectives: To evaluate the antiseptic of the 810 nm diode laser to Endodontic treatment of single-rooted teeth when compared with conventional endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: Design randomized clinical intervention research with a control group, performed on 70 patients with single-rooted teeth with irreversible pulpitis in one tooth with an indication for root canal therapy. Divided into two groups (n=35): Sampled the S1 microbiota in the previous stage of myeloid preparation. With microbiological sample S2: The control group has pumped a total of 20ml NaOCl 3% + 5ml EDTA 17% +5ml physiological saline. Laser group: Irrigating 20ml NaOCl 3%+5ml EDTA 17% +5ml physiological saline + 810 nm diode laser irradiated. The real-time PCR technique was used to identify and quantify bacteria present in the sample. Results: There was a statistically significant lower bacteria in the 810 nm diode laser treatment group compared with the conventional endodontic treatment group with p<0.05. Control group: The average bacterial concentration in the microbiological sample before myeloid tube preparation was: 7.61E+06 DU, after myeloid tube preparation: 5.26E+05 DU, the percentage of bacteria decreased by 93.43%, (p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U). The laser group 810 nm: The average concentration of bacteria in the microbiological sample before the preparation of the myeloid tube was: 1.12E+07DU, after the preparation of the myeloid tube: 1.06E+05, the rate of microorganisms decreased by 95.58%. Use molecular biology to detect the presence of bacteria in the study samples. Conclusion: The 810 nm diode laser is a successful adjunct to conventional endodontic treatment and has a clinical antiseptic effect.
Article Details
Keywords
Endodontic, laser diode, intracanal laser
References
2. Dina A. Morsy, Maged Negm, Alaa Diab, Geraldine Ahmed (2018), Postoperative pain and antibacterial effect of 980 nm diode laser versus conventional endodontic treatment in necrotic teeth with chronic periapical lesions: A randomized control trial, F1000Research, 7:1795.
3. Gutknecht, N., et al. (2005), Temperture evolution on human teeth root surface after diode laser asisted endodontic treatment, Lasers Med Sci. 20(2), pp. 99-103.
4. Harpreet Singh (2016), Microbiology of Endodontic Infections, Journal of Dental and Oral Health, ISSN: 2369-4475.
5. Ilaria Prada, Pedro Micó-Muñoz, Teresa Giner-Lluesma, Pablo Micó-Martínez, Nicolás Collado- Castellano, Alberto Manzano-Saiz (2019), Influence of microbiology on endodontic failure. Literature review, Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 1;24 (3): e364-72.
6. J.F. Siqueira Jr. and I.N. Rôças (2009) Diversity of Endodontic Microbiota Revisited, J Dent Res 88(11):969–981.
7. Jialei Xu, Yuan Gao, Yajun Meng, Weiwei Wu, Chialing Tsauo, Tingwei Guo,Yangpei Cao, Dingming Huang, Xuedong Zhou & Jinzhi He (2020), Mechano-chemical coupling of irrigation enhances endodontic biofilm debridement, Biofouling The Journal of Bioadhesion and Biofilm Research, 36(7):792-799. DOI:10.1080/08927014.2020.1814753.
8. Khosrow Sohrabi, Aidin Sooratgar, Kaveh Zolfagharnasab, Mohammad Javad Kharazifard, Farzaneh Afkhami (2016), Antibacterial Activity of Diode Laser and Sodium Hypochlorite in Enterococcus Faecalis-Contaminated Root Canals, IEJ Iranian Endodontic Journal;11(1): 8-12.
9. Metzger Zvi (2014). The self-adjusting file (SAF) system: An evidence-based update . Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 17(5), pp. 401-419.
10. Neves M. A., Rôças I. N., Siqueira J. F. Jr. (2014), Clinical antibacterial effectiveness of the self- adjusting file system, Int Endod J, 47 (4), pp. 356-365.
11. Tilakchand M, Singh NN, Yeli MM, Naik BD (2018), Evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of EZLASE diode LASER on the infected root canal system: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. ;21(3):306-310. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_14_18.