SURVEYING ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTIBIOTIC ACTIVITY OF SOME PROBIOTIC STRAINS

Thi Truc Ly Duong1,, Vu Quynh Huong Ngo1, Mong To Tam Tran 1, Cat Dong Tran 2
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Probiotic products are becoming widely consumed. However, their quality has not been controlled strictly. Probiotic strains must have standards of safety, antibiotic resistance and antimicrobial ability. Objectives: The objective of this paper is surveying antibacterial and antibiotic resistance activity of isolated probiotic and applying for isolated probiotic in sơme products. Materials and methods: 16 isolated strains of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Bacillus, Streptococcus and Enterococcus were surveyed antibacterial activity (cross streak method and agar well diffusion method), antibiotic resistance property (Agar disk diffusion, Agar dilution and ATB ANA test of bioMérieux). Results: The results showed that 14 out of 16 isolated strains are able to inhibit common pathogenic bacteria, strong antagonistic effect is usually caused by bacteria of LAB (lactic acid bacteria). Bacillus strains are also resistant to Gram positive pathogens but less resistant than experimental LAB. Most probiotic surveyed are susceptible to common antibiotics, in spite of some resistant cases. Conclusion: In this survey, most strains of probiotic products had required beneficial properties.

Article Details

References

1. Bộ môn Vi Sinh (2013), Giáo trình thực tập vi sinh công nghệ, Khoa Dược, Trường Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, pp.14-17.
2. Bộ môn Vi Sinh (2010), Giáo trình thực tập vi sinh học, Khoa Y, Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ, tr. 10-13, pp.30-43.
3. Phạm Hùng Vân, Phạm Thái Bình (2013), Kháng sinh, đề kháng kháng sinh, kỹ thuật kháng sinh đồ các vấn đề thường gặp, Nhà xuất bản Y Học, Tr.103-127.
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institude, (2008) “Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria”, Approved guideline vol 26, pp. 14-15.
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institude (2012), “Method for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically”, Approved standard.
6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institude (2014), “Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing”, Approved standard.
7. Charteris W.P., Kelly P.M., Morelli L., Collins J. K. (1998), “Antibiotic susceptibility of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus species”, Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 61, pp. 16361643.
8. Mel’nikova E. U., Koroleva N. S. (1975), “Capacity of Lb. bulgaricus and Str.
Thermophilus starter to produce antibiotic substances”, Journal of Dairy Sciences, Vol. 37(7), pp. 4329-4332.
9. Miteva V., Stefanova T.Z., Takova T.Z, Grigorova R. (1991), “Isolation and characterisation of plasmids from different strains of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus”, Acta Microbiologica Bulgarica, Vol. 27, pp. 3-8.
10. Poltavska O. A., Kovalenko N. K. (2012), “Antimicrobial activity of Bifidobacterial bacteriocin- like substances”, Mikrobiolohichnyi Zhurnal (Microbiological Journal), Vol.
74 (5), pp. 32-42.