ASSOCIATED FACTORS AND RESULTS OF AN CLINICAL TRIAL IN IMPROVING QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS AT CAO VAN CHI PRIVATE GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2019

Anh Dung Dao1,
1 Cao Van Chi Private General Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Hemodialysis patients experience many troubles of physical and mental health, social and economic issues that  fmake bad influences on their quality of life (QOL). Objectives: to evaluate the quality of life and its associated factors and results of a clinical trial on improving the quality of life for hemodialysis patients. Materials and methods: An uncontrolled clinical trial with pre- and post comparison was conducted at Cao Van Chi private general hospital, Tay Ninh. Sixty-eight hemodialysis patients aged 18 and over and 3 months of hemodialysis at the hospital were randomly selected from the total of 105 hemodialysis patients. We used the SF-36 version 1.0 to evaluate quality of life for patients. Intervention strategies consisted of quality control for hemodialysis and community integration for patients. Results: At baseline, the average total score of QOL among hemodialysis patients was  54.07 (SD: 18.97). We found some associated factors of QOL, including patient age, duration of dialysis, level of blood albumin and hemoglobin, and URR index. Average score of QOL was increased up to 66.50 (SD: 18.22) after 3 months of interventions. Conclusion: Hematological and biochemical control in hemodialysis have significant association with patients’ QOL. Thus, anemia management, hypoalbuminemia treatment, quality control in hemodialysis and enhancing community integration for patients will improve their quality of life.

Article Details

References

1. Bộ Y tế (2008), Hướng dẫn người khuyết tật và gia đình về phục hồi chức năng dựa vào cộng đồng.
2. Bộ Y tế (2018), Hướng dẫn quy trình kỹ thuật thận nhân tạo, Quyết định số 2482/QĐ-BYT.
3. Hoàng Bùi Bảo, Lê Hữu Lợi (2012), Nghiên cứu chất lượng sống ở Bệnh nhân suy thận mạn giai đoạn cuối. Tạp chí Y Dược học – Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế, Tập 2(5) - Số 11/2012; tr 22.
4. Nguyễn Dũng, Võ Văn Thắng (2014), Chất lượng cuộc sống và các yếu tố liên quan ở bệnh nhân suy thận mạn giai đoạn cuối tại Bệnh viện đa khoa tỉnh Bình Định, Y học cộng đồng, Số 10+11, tr 38-45.
5. Albert H. A et al (2012), Differences in quality of life of hemodialysis patients between dialysis centers, Qual Life Res 21: pp 299–307.
6. Bach Nguyen, Fukuchi (2017), Survival rates and causes of death in Vietnamese chronic hemodialysis patients. Renal Replacement Therapy (2017) 3: pp 22.
7. Duong et al (2015), Challenges of hemodialysis in Vietnam: experience from the first standardized district dialysis unit in Ho Chi Minh City, BMC Nephrology (2015) 16: pp 122.
8. Kamyar et al (2001), Association among SF36 Quality of Life measures and nutrition, hospitalization, and mortality in Hemodialysis, J Am Soc Nephrol 12: pp 2797–2806, 2001.
9. Magda Bayoumi et al (2013), Predictors of quality of life in hemodialysis patients, Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2013 Mar; 24(2): pp 254-9.
10. Tayebeh Soleymanian et al (2017), SF36 Quality of Life and Mortality across different levels of serum albumin in patients with hemodialysis, Nephrourol Mon. 2017 July; 9(4): e45319.