PRE-OPERATION PATIENT CLASSIFICATION USING ASA 2019 AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL IN 2021

Nguyen Hong Phuc Vo1, , Van Dang Tran2, Vu Linh Le2, Van Kim Long Vu2, Anh Duy Nguyen2, Thuy Tien Dang2, Nhu Huynh2
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital
2 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: ASA-PS classification has been applied to surgical patients all over the world preoperatively. The 2019 Amended ASA-PS was modified by new definitions, approved examples, especially definition for emergent patients. In Vietnam, there has not any independent study on ASAPS classification up to now. Objectives: determine the ratio of patients of each ASA class and determine patients’ underlying diseases. Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study, the sample size was ≥ 380, and the sampling method was convenience sampling. Results: There were 528 patients of both 5 emergent and elective operations included. The ratio of ASA were I (39.21%), II (33.52%), III (17.42%), I-E (6.06%), II-E (3.03%) and III-E (0.76%). None of the cases was classified as ASA IV/IV-E, V/V-E or VI. The most common patients’ health conditions were social alcohol drinker and current smoker. The most popular underlying diseases were diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, mild respiratory diseases (history of asthma or pulmonary tuberculosis) and COPD. Conclusions: The ASA ratio were I (39.21%), II (33.52%), III (17.42%), I-E (6.06%), II-E (3.03%) and III-E (0.76%). Patients might have more than one health condition or underlying disease by pre-operative evaluation. 

Article Details

References

1. Abouleish AE, Vinta SR, Shabot SM, et al. (2020), Improving agreement of ASA physical status class between pre-anesthesia screening and day of surgery by adding institutionalspecific and ASA-approved examples: a quality improvement project. Perioper Med (Lond), 9(1):34.
2. American Diabetes Association (2021), Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care, 44: S15-S33.
3. ASA House of Delegates (2019), ASA physical status classification system, https://www.asahq.org.
4. Hurwitz EE, Simon M, Vinta SR, et al. (2017), Adding Examples to the ASA-Physical Status Classification Improves Correct Assignment to Patients. Anesthesiology, 126(4):614-622.
5. Irita K, Kawashima Y, Tsuzaki K, et al. (2002), Perioperative mortality and morbidity in the year 2000 in 502 Japanese certified anesthesia-training hospitals: with a special reference to ASA-physical status--report of the Japan Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating Room Safety. Masui, 51(1):71-85.
6. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. (2014), Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Report From the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA, 311(5):507-520.
7. Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS (2019), A review of ASA physical status historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia, 74:373-379.
8. Miller RD (2019), Miller's Anesthesia, ninth edition. Vol. 1,2: Elsevier.