Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 12/06/2023
Online Published: 12/06/2023
Abstract Views: 78
Views PDF: 49
Issue
No. 45 (2022)
Section
Article
How to Cite
Pham, A. T., Duong, T. T., Le, X. L., Le, T. B. K., Le, D. D. M., & Vo, T. N. (2023). INITIAL EFFECTIVE EVALUATION OF SPINAL SURGICAL IMPLANTS MANUFACTURED BY IQ-LIFE COMPANY. Cantho Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, 45, 191-198. https://tapchi.ctump.edu.vn/index.php/ctump/article/view/1011

INITIAL EFFECTIVE EVALUATION OF SPINAL SURGICAL IMPLANTS MANUFACTURED BY IQ-LIFE COMPANY

Anh Tuan Pham1,2,, Thanh Tung Duong3, Xuan Long Le4, Thai Binh Khang Le1, Duc Dinh Mien Le1, Thanh Nghia Vo1,2
1 Thong Nhat Hospital
2 Nguyen Tri Phuong Hospital
3 Nhan Dan Gia Đinh Hospital
4 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: There is no Vietnamese company that manufactures spinal surgical implants; and no research on the safety of spinal surgical implants on Vietnamese. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of spinal surgical implants  manufactured by IQlife company. Materials and method: This was a case series study of patients who had spinal surgery using implants manufactured by IQ-life company, at Nguyen Tri Phuong hospital, Nhan Dan Gia Dinh hospital, Thong Nhat hospital from Dec-2019 to Jun-2020. Results: 15 cases were operated, include 10 lumbar fusion cases, 4 anterior cervical discectomy anf fusion cases, 1 posterior cervical fusion case. There were a serious adverse event (6%) and five adverse event (30%) in this study. 87% of cases had very good and 13% of cases had good clinical appearance. Conclusion: Spinal surgical implants manufactured by IQ-life company are effective and safe for Vietnamese.

Article Details

Keywords

Medical instrument, spinal surgery

References

1. Alam S., et al (2015), Surgery for spinal tuberculosis: a multi-center experience of 582 cases. J Spine Surg, 1(1):65-71.
2. Barbanti-Brodano G., Griffoni, C., Halme, J. et al (2020), Spinal surgery complications: an unsolved problem—Is the World Health Organization Safety Surgical Checklist an useful tool to reduce them?. Eur Spine J, 29, 927–936.
3. Campbell PG, Malone J, Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Harrop JS, Sharan AD, et al (2010), Early complications related to approach in cervical spine surgery: single-center prospective study. World Neurosurg, 73:395–401.
4. Campbell, P.G., et al (2011), Complications related to instrumentation in spine surgery: a prospective analysis. Neuro Surg Focus, 31, 4: E10.
5. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG (2010), Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. Spine J, 9:374–386.
6. Flippin M., et al (2017), Effect of body mass index on patient outcomes of surgical intervention for the lumbar spine. J Spine Surg, 3(3):349-357.
7. Proietti L, Scaramuzzo L., Schiro G.R., Sessa S., Logroscino C.A. (2013), Complications in lumbar spine surgery: A retrospective analysis. Indian J Orthop, 47(4):340-5.
8. Siemionow K.B., et al (2017), Perioperative complications in patients treated with posterior cervical fusion and bilateral cages. Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine 8(4):342-349.