Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 12/06/2023
Online Published: 12/06/2023
Abstract Views: 89
Views PDF: 146
Issue
No. 45 (2022)
Section
Article
How to Cite
Huynh, H. A., Lam, C. T., & Vo, T. H. T. (2023). CLINICAL, PARACLINICAL FEATURES AND EVALUATING THE TREATMENT RESULTS OF NASAL TRAUMA AT CAN THO CENTRAL GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2019 – 2021. Cantho Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, 45, 83-90. https://tapchi.ctump.edu.vn/index.php/ctump/article/view/994

CLINICAL, PARACLINICAL FEATURES AND EVALUATING THE TREATMENT RESULTS OF NASAL TRAUMA AT CAN THO CENTRAL GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2019 – 2021

Hung Anh Huynh1,, Chanh Thi Lam2, Thi Huynh Trang Vo1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Can Tho Central General Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Nasal trauma is the most common injury of all types of facial trauma in Vietnam and other countries around the world. Early intervention helps most cases recover and avoid complications. Objective: To determine the clinical, paraclinical features and to evaluate the treatment results of nasal trauma at Can Tho Central General Hospital. Material and methods: 60 patients were diagnosed with nasal trauma and were treated by closed reduction and open reduction at Can Tho Central General Hospital from February 2019 to January 2021. The method was a descriptive and prospective study with clinical intervention. Results: 60 patients (49 men, 11 women, mean age 29.8) with nasal trauma were involved in the study. The most common symptoms were epistaxis, pain, nasal obstruction, accounting for 93.3%, 90%, and 86.7%, respectively. The most common sign was bleeding or blood pooling in the anterior nasal passage with 95%. Regarding the paraclinical features: On computed tomography of the nose and sinuses, type FI accounts for the highest rate: 35%. Treatment results: After one week and two weeks, treatment results were primarily average and good, with a total of 98.3%. Conclusion: Closed reduction is still the method used mainly in cases of nasal trauma.

Article Details

Keywords

nasal trauma, closed reduction, open reduction

References

1. Tiêu Phương Lâm và Trần Thị Bích Liên (2014), Chỉnh hình biến dạng mũi do chấn thương, Y học TP. Hồ Chí Minh, 18 (1), tr. 181-192.
2. Trần Ngọc Tường Linh và Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung (2013), Khảo sát tình hình gãy xương chính mũi tại bệnh viện Tai Mũi Họng thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Y học TP. Hồ Chí Minh, 17 (1), tr. 72-78.
3. A. J. Ashoor & F. A. Alkhars (2000), Nasal bone fracture, Saudi Med J, 21 (5), pp. 471-474.
4. Y. Cil & E. Kahraman (2013), An analysis of 45 patients with pure nasal fractures, Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 19 (2), pp. 152-156.
5. M. Daniel & U. Raghavan (2005), Relation between epistaxis, external nasal deformity, and septal deviation following nasal trauma, Emerg Med J, 22 (11), pp. 778-779.
6. T. Hung, et al. (2007), Patient satisfaction after closed reduction of nasal fractures, Arch Facial Plast Surg, 9 (1), pp. 40-43.
7. C. M. Kang & D. G. Han (2017), Objective Outcomes of Closed Reduction According to the Type of Nasal Bone Fracture, Arch Craniofac Surg, 18 (1), pp. 30-36.
8. M. Muraoka & Y. Nakai (1998), Twenty years of statistics and observation of facial bone fracture, Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 538, pp. 261-265.
9. Takenori Ogawa, et al. (2002), Clinical study and image diagnosis of nasal bone fracture, Jibi Inkoka Rinsho, 95 (1), pp. 51-61.
10. Paul Flint, et al. (2014), Cummings Otolaryngology, Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia.
11. M. F. Stranc & G. A. Robertson (1979), A classification of injuries of the nasal skeleton, Ann Plast Surg, 2 (6), pp. 468-474.