Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 12/06/2022
Online Published: 12/06/2023
Abstract Views: 102
Views PDF: 110
Issue
No. 46 (2022)
Section
Article
How to Cite
Le, T. A. D., Nguyen, D. N., & Nguyen, M. T. (2023). RESULTS OF TREATMENT FOR CESAREAN SCAR PREGNANCY AT HANOI HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY IN 2019-2020. Cantho Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, 46, 105-111. https://tapchi.ctump.edu.vn/index.php/ctump/article/view/919

RESULTS OF TREATMENT FOR CESAREAN SCAR PREGNANCY AT HANOI HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY IN 2019-2020

Thi Anh Dao Le1,, Duc Nghia Nguyen2, Manh Tri Nguyen2
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is growing more frequent in the past 10 years. Currently, no final consensus on CSP management has been made. Objectives: To analyse several factors relating to the results of CSP treatment at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital within the span of 2 years from 2019 to 2020. Materials and methods: a cross-sectional, prospective study on patients with caesarean scar pregnancy under 10 weeks. Results: 174 patients were eligible to participate in the study. 83.9% of subjects with gestational age less than 8 weeks were successfully treated by vacuum aspiration. 8 cases of over 9-week gestation all had angiogenesis and all underwent  preservative  hysterotomy.  Conclusions:  Gestational  age  is  an  important  factor determining the management of CSP. With gestational age less than 8 weeks, vacuum aspiration is a successful treatment.

Article Details

Keywords

cesarean scar pregnancy, fetal age, vacuum aspiration

References

1. Nguyễn Quảng Bắc, Nguyễn Thị Kim Ngân, 2021. Nghiên cứu điều trị các trường hợp chữa sẹo mổ lấy thai bằng phẫu thuật tại bệnh viện Phụ Sản Trung ương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam tập 503 số 2 (2021).
2. Phác đồ điều trị sản phụ khoa bệnh viện Từ Dũ (2019). Thai sẹo mổ lấy thai trang 216-228.
3. Gonzalez N.,Tulandi T., 2017. Review Article Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Vol 24, No 5.
4. Ibrahim Polat 1, Ali Ekiz, 2016. Suction Curettage as First Line Treatment in Cases With Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Feasibility and Effectiveness in Early Pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(7):1066-71.
5. Michener C, Dickinson JE, 2009. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a single centre case series. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:451–5.
6. Petersen K.B., Hoffmann E., Larsen C.R., 2016. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertility and Sterility® Vol. 105, No. 4.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130).
7. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (RCOG), 2016. Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy (Green-top Guideline No. 21- 2016).
8. Salomon L.J., Fernandez H., Chauveaud A., 2003. Successful management of a heterotopic Caesarean scar pregnancy: potassium chlorid injection with preservation of the intrauterine gestation: case report. Hum Reprod, 18(1), 189-191.
9. Sarah Maheux-Lacroix , Fiona Li , Emmanuel Bujold , 2017. Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: A Systematic Review of Treatment Options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. Sep-Oct 2017;24(6):915-925.
10. Timor- Tritsch, 2012. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 207(1): p. 44 e1-13.
11. Timor-Tritsch IE, Khatib N, Monteagudo A, 2015. Cesarean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34: 601–10.
12. Wang et al, 2006. Cesarean scar pregnancy treated by endoscopy. Fertility Sterility Vol. 85, No. 2.