VALIDATION OF A VIETNAMESE VERSION OF THE GERIATRIC DEPRESSION SCALE (GDS 30)

Thi Tuyet Minh Nguyen1,, Thang Nguyen1, Van Thong Nguyen1, Thi Kim Xuyen Nguyen1, Truong Phuong Nghi Huynh1, Tieu Yen Luong1, Thi Hong Lien Pham1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Depression is one of the common mental disorders in older populations. It can be considered as a risk factor for other aging problems such as dementia, decreased quality of life and increased suicide rate. Prompt recognition of depression for early treatment requires a reliable and valid assessment tool. Objectives: The study aimed to validate the Vietnamese version of the geriatric depression scale (GDS 30). Materials and methods: A cross sectional study on hypertensive inpatients aged 60 and above was conducted from May 2020 to March 2021, at the Geriatric Department of Can Tho General Hospital. We interviewed 55 participants the second time using the Vietnamese version GDS 30. The data were analysed using SPSS 18.0. Results: Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and content validity of the GDS were assessed. In terms of internal consistency reliability, Cronbach’s Alpha for the Vietnamese version was 0,912, and Spearman's coefficient value was >0.3. The content validity was 0.88 for such aspects as semantic, idiomatic, conceptual equivalence while it was 0.84 for experiential equivalence. Conclusions: The Vietnamese version GDS 30 proved to be a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of depression. The questionnaire can be used by health professionals for the evaluation of depression symptoms in geriatric population.

Article Details

References

1. Adams, K.B., Matto, H.C., Sanders, S., (2004), Confirmatory factor analysis of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Gerontologist 44, 818–826.
2. Burke, W.J., Roccaforte, W.H., Wengel, S.P., Conley, D.M., Potter, J.F., (1995) The reliability and validity of the Geriatric Depression Rating Scale administered by telephone. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc 43, 674–679.
3. Ertan T. and Eker E., (2000), Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the geriatric depression scale in Turkish elderly: Are there different factor structures for different cultures? (in eng), Int Psychogeriatr, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 163-72.
4. Fiske, A., Wetherel, J, L., Gatz, M., (2009), Depression in older adults. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol 5, 363–389.
5. Galeoto G. et al. (2018), A Psychometric Properties Evaluation of the Italian Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale, (in eng), Depress Res Treat, vol. 2018, p. 1797536.
6. Kim L. J. Y. et al.(2008), Standardization of the korean version of the geriatric depression scale: Reliability, validity, and factor structure, (in eng), Psychiatry Investig, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 232-8.
7. Malakouti, S.K., Fatollahi, P., Mirabzadeh, A., Salavati, M., Zandi, T., (2006) Reliability, validity and factor structure of the GDS-15 in Iranian elderly. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 21, 588–593.
8. Mui, A.C., Kang, S.Y., Chen, L.M., Omanski, M.D., (2003), Reliability of the Geriatric Depression Scale for use among elderly Asian immigrants in the USA. Int. Psychogeriatr 15, 253–271.
9. Stanetic K., Stanetic M. et al (2017), Prevalence of depression in patients with hypertension. International Journal of Medical and Health Research, 3(2), 16-21.
10. Taber K. S., (2018), The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education, Research in Science Education, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1273-1296.
11. Vietnam National Committee on Aging (2019), Towards a comprehensive national policy for an ageing in Viet Nam