Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 15/04/2023
Online Published: 15/04/2023
Abstract Views: 490
Views PDF: 422
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2023i58.715
Issue
No. 58 (2023): HỘI NGHỊ KHOA HỌC QUỐC TẾ MỞ RỘNG LẦN THỨ II NĂM 2023
Section
Article
How to Cite
Nguyen, Q. H., & Le, N. B. H. (2023). EVALUATION OF IMPLANT TREATMENT WITH BONE GRAFTING IN PARTIALLY MAXILARY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS. Cantho Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, 58, 225-231. https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2023i58.715

EVALUATION OF IMPLANT TREATMENT WITH BONE GRAFTING IN PARTIALLY MAXILARY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS

Quang Hai Nguyen1,, Nhu Bao Hieu Le2
1 Da Nang Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology
2 Da Nang University of Medical Technology and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

  Background: Implant with bone graft is the most advanced and popular method of restoring tooth loss today, but there is a lack of clinical research and results. This study aims to evaluate implant treatment with bone grafting Objective: To assess the result of implant treatment with bone grafting in partially edentulous patients. Materials and method: The study was performed on 41 partially maxillary edentulous patients who were treated with implant placement at Da Nang hospital of Odonto-Stomatology. The implant survival, complications and rehabilitation were evaluated as criteria for success. Results: There were no implant failures. The success of chewing and aesthetic rehabilitation was at 97.2% and 93% respectively. Implant complications was pain (67.6%), swelling (53.5%) and wound unhealing (8.5%). Conclusion: Implants with bone grafting in partially maxillary edentulous patients can be considered as a safe treatment in oral rehabilitation of patients.

Article Details

Keywords

Implant, bone graft, patients

References

1. Abd El Salam El Askary (2008), Chapter 12: Treatment complications inthe esthetic zone, Fundamentals of Esthetic Implant Dentistry, pp. 301- 326
2. Franco Santoro, Carlo Mariorana (2005), “Advanced osseointegration in the aesthetic areas”, Advanced osseointegration, pp. 196-231
3. Jemt T. (1997), “Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment”, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent., 17(4), pp.326-333.
4. Kahraman S, Bal BT, Asar NV, et al. (2009), “Clinical study on the insertion torque and wireless resonance frequency analysis in the assessment of torque capacity and stability of self-tapping dental implants”, J Oral Rehabil., 36(10), pp. 755-761.
5. Kourtis S.G., Sotiriadou S., Voliotis S., Challas A. (2004), “Private practice results of dental implants. Part I: survival and evaluation of risk factors - Part II: surgical and prosthetic complications”, Implant Dent, 13(4), 373-8.
6. Mombelli A., Lang N.P. (1992), “Antimicrobial treatment of peri-implant infections”, Clin Oral Implants Res, 3(4), 162-8.
7. Moon-Sun Kim, Jae-Kwan Lee, Heung-Sik Um., et al. (2011), “Masticatory function following implants replacing a second molar”, J Periodontal Implant Sci, 41, pp. 79-85.
8. Nadine Brodala, Med Dent (2009), “Flapless surgery and its effect ondental implant outcomes”, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2, 24, pp. 118-125.
9. Raes F., Cosyn J., De Bruyn H. (2012), Clinical, Aesthetic, and Patient- Related Outcome of Immediately Loaded Single Implants in the Anterior Maxilla: A Prospective Study in Extraction Sockets, Healed Ridges, and Grafted Sites. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.
10. Salvatore Longoni, MatteoSartori, Marc Braun (2007), “Lingual vascular canals of the mandible: the risk of bleeding complications during implant procedures”, Implant Dent, 16, pp. 131-138.
11. Sammartino G., Marenzi G., di Lauro A.E., et al. (2007), “Aesthetics in oral implantology: Biological, clinical, surgical, and prosthetic aspects”, Implant Dent, 16(1), pp. 54-65.
12. Silness J., Loe H. (1964), “Periodontal disease in pregnancy: Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition”, Acta Odontol Scand, 22, pp. 121-35.