CLINICAL AND PARACLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THERMAL BURN PATIENTS AT VIETNAM NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MARITIME MEDICINE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Thermal burns are injuries of the skin or other tissues caused by overexposure to hot or cold heat sources. Burn accidents are common in work as well as in daily life, accounting for 5-10% of surgical injuries. It has been the ninth leading cause of global burden of disease and injury. Depending on the causative factors, the first aid process before admission and the severity of the burn, each patient will exhibit different clinical and paraclinical characteristics, based on which there will be different therapeutic approaches. Objectives: To describe the clinical and paraclinical characteristics in thermal burn patients. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study on 82 thermal burn patients who came to Vietnam National Institute of Maritime Medicine in the period between 01/2018 and 10/2022. Results: The mean age of studied patients was 48.4 ± 19.5 years old; female accounted for 57.3%; 51.2% of patients came to the hospital within the first 6 hours; 58.5% of them had improper first aid before hospital admission; 74.4% of patients were burned by boiled water; the proportion of patients who had lower body parts burned was 64.6%; 80.5% of them had total body surface area (%TBSA) <10%; 58.5% of them had severe pain with the mean score of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was 7.0 ± 1.7; the group of patients with 3rd degree burns had a higher rate of poor first aid, a larger %TBSA burned and a higher glycemia index. Conclusions: Thermal burns occur in everyone no matter their age or gender, the most common cause is boiled water, the burn site is usually the lower body part with moderate severity, most of them had severe pain. The 3rd degree burn group had a higher percentage of patients with poor first aid, a larger %TBSA burned and a higher blood sugar index than the 2nd degree burn group.
Article Details
Keywords
Thermal burns, clinical characteristics, first aid, %TBSA
References
2. Kowalske K. and Helm P. Visionary leadership in burn rehabilitation over 50 years: major accomplishments, but mission unfulfilled. PMR. 2014. 6(9), 769-773, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.08.002.
3. Nguyễn Viết Lượng. Tình hình bỏng tại Việt Nam trong 2 năm 2008 – 2009. Tạp chí Y học thực hành. 2010. 11, 741.
4. Chen K.-L, Wu C.-J., Tseng W.-S., Lee H.-C., Tsai T.-P. et al. Improvement of satisfaction in burn patients receiving adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Formos. J. Surg. 2018. 51, 184– 192, doi: 10.4103/fjs.fjs_162_17.
5. Dolp R., Rehou S., McCann M.R. and Jeschke M.G. Contributors to the length-of-stay trajectory in burn-injured patients. Burns. 2018. 44(8), 2011–2017, doi:10.1016/j.burns.2018.07.004.
6. Phạm Thị Yến. Nghiên cứu kết quả điều trị vết thương phần mềm chậm liền có phối hợp với trị liệu oxy cao áp tại Viện Y học biển năm 2016-2017. Trường Đại học Y Dược Hải Phòng. 2017.
7. Biswas A., Bharara M., Hurst C., Gruessner R., Armstrong D. et al. Use of sugar on the healing of diabetic ulcers: a review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010. 4(5), 1139-45, doi:10.1177/193229681000400512.
8. Đoàn Chí Thanh. Tình hình thu dung và điều trị bệnh nhân bỏng nội trú tại Bệnh viện Bỏng Quốc gia Lê Hữu Trác năm 2019. Tạp Chí Y học Thảm Họa Và Bỏng. 2020. (3), 7-21.
9. Wood F.M., Phillips M., Jovic T., Cassidy J.T., Cameron P et al. Water First Aid Is Beneficial In Humans Post-Burn: Evidence from a Bi-National Cohort Study. PLoS ONE. 2016. 11(1), e0147259, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147259
10. Holm C., Horbrand F., Mayr M., Henckel G. and Muhlbauer W. Acute hyperglycaemia following thermal injury: friend or foe?. Resuscitation. 2004. 60(1), 71–7, doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.08.003.
11. Mecott G.A., Al-Mousawi A.M., Gauglitz G.G., Herndon D.N. and Jeschke M.G. The role of hyperglycemia in burned patients: evidence-based studies. Shock. 2010. 33(1), 5-13, doi:10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181af0494.