PREDICTIVE VALUE OF THE MAP(ASH) AND ABC SCORES FOR MORTALITY AND EARLY REBLEEDING IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING DUE TO RUPTURED ESOPHAGEAL VARICES

Thi My Duyen Le1, Hieu Tam Huynh1, , Thi Ngoc Thuy Thai1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: To minimize risks and personalize management protocols for cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding, predicting clinical outcomes and assessing disease severity are of core significance. Objective: To investigate the characteristics of clinical outcomes, the association according to risk stratification, and compare the predictive values of the MAP(ASH) and ABC scoring systems for mortality and early rebleeding risks in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding due to esophageal varices. Materials and methods: Using a cross-sectional descriptive study design, data were collected and analyzed from 170 cases of liver cirrhosis with bleeding due to ruptured esophageal varices, receiving inpatient treatment at Can Tho Central General Hospital. Results: The rates of mortality and early rebleeding events in the study sample were 8.2% and 9.4%, respectively. Regarding the capability to predict mortality, both tools demonstrated excellent predictive values, with the area under the curve (AUC) of MAP(ASH) reaching 0.892 (95% CI: 0.826 – 0.959) and that of ABC reaching 0.874 (95% CI: 0.808 – 0.940), with p < 0.001 for both scores in predicting mortality. The DeLong test indicated that the predictive performances of these two scoring systems were comparable (p = 0.638). At the cut-off threshold of 5, MAP(ASH) achieved a sensitivity (Se) of 92.9% and a specificity (Sp) of 71.8%; whereas ABC at the cut-off threshold of 7 recorded a Se of 92.9% and a Sp of 74.4%. Notably, in assessing the risk of rebleeding, MAP(ASH) demonstrated superior performance compared to ABC (AUC: 0.788 (0.697 - 0.879) vs. 0.671 (0.530 - 0.812)), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.044). Conclusion: Both scoring systems have high reliability in predicting mortality. However, the MAP(ASH) score is more sensitive in forecasting the risk of early clinical rebleeding but carries a higher risk of false positives compared to the ABC score.

Article Details

References

1. Xie W, Chen F.X, Zhu L.Y, Wen C.C, and Zhang X. Risk assessment of first upper gastrointestinal bleeding using computerized tomoscanning in esophageal varices patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. 99(5), e18923, doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018923.
2. Pfisterer N, Unger L.W, and Reiberger T. Clinical algorithms for the prevention of variceal bleeding and rebleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. World J Hepatol. 2021. 13(7), 731-746, doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i7.731.
3. Laursen S.B, Oakland K, Laine L, Bieber V, Marmo R, et al. ABC score: a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicentre study. Gut. 2021. 70(4), 707-716, doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320002.
4. Redondo-Cerezo E, Vadillo-Calles F, Stanley A.J, Laursen S, Laine L, et al. MAP(ASH): A new scoring system for the prediction of intervention and mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. 35(1), 82-89, doi: 10.1111/jgh.14811.
5. Nguyễn Thị Huyền Trang, Trần Thị Ánh Tuyết, Nguyễn Văn Mạnh, Trần Thị Lượng, Nguyễn Anh Tuấn, và cộng sự. Nghiên cứu giá trị của thang điểm MAP (ASH) trong tiên lượng chảy máu tiêu hóa do vỡ giãn tĩnh mạch thực quản, tĩnh mạch phình vị ở bệnh nhân xơ gan. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024. 539(3), doi: 10.51298/vmj.v539i3.10021.
6. Li Y, Lu Q, Song M, Wu K, and Ou X. Comparisons of six endoscopy independent scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes for elderly and younger patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022. 22(1), 187, doi: 10.1186/s12876-02202266-1.
7. Jimenez-Rosales R, Lopez-Tobaruela J.M, Lopez-Vico M, Ortega-Suazo E.J, Martinez-Cara J.G, et al. Performance of the New ABC and MAP(ASH) Scores in the Prediction of Relevant Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. J Clin Med. 2023. 12(3), 1085, doi: 10.3390/jcm12031085.
8. Nguyễn Thị Huyền Trang, Nguyễn Tiến Thịnh, Mai Thanh Bình, Trần Thị Ánh Tuyết, Trần Văn Mạnh, và cộng sự. Nghiên cứu giá trị của thang điểm ABC trong tiên lượng chảy máu tiêu hóa do vỡ giãn tĩnh mạch thực quản, tĩnh mạch phình vị ở bệnh nhân xơ gan. Tạp chí Y Dược lâm sàng 108. 2023. 18(5), 18-24, doi: 10.52389/ydls.v18i5.1884.
9. Liu S, Zhang X, Walline J.H, Yu X, and Zhu H. Comparing the Performance of the ABC, AIMS65, GBS, and pRS Scores in Predicting 90-day Mortality Or Rebleeding Among Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study. J Transl Int Med. 2021. 9(2), 114-122, doi: 10.2478/jtim-2021-0026.
10. Nguyễn Thanh Liêm, Phan Thị Kim Tuyến, Võ Anh Hổ, Lâm Phước Thiện. Giá trị của thang điểm ABC-Score trong tiên lượng bệnh nhân xơ gan có xuất huyết tiêu hóa do vỡ giãn tĩnh mạch thực quản. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2025. 552(1), doi: 10.51298/vmj.v552i1.14910.