Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 29/06/2023
Online Published: 29/06/2023
Abstract Views: 254
Views PDF: 181
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2023i60.444
Issue
No. 60 (2023)
Section
Article
How to Cite
Le, Q. T., Dam, V. C., Le, T. B., Tran, H. T., Nguyen, T. H., & Quach, V. T. P. (2023). TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA BY HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL. Cantho Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, 60, 107-112. https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2023i60.444

TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA BY HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL

Quang Trung Le1,, Van Cuong Dam1, Thanh Binh Le1, Huynh Tuan Tran1, Trung Hieu Nguyen1, Vo Tan Phat Quach1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common disease in men, it causes urinary tract disorders that affects to patients’s quality of life. Currently, high-intensity focused ultrasound is a breakthrough in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. This is an effective, minimally invasive, and relatively safe treatment. Objectives: To describe clinical, subclinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of benign prostatic hyperplasia by high-intensity focused ultrasound at Can Tho university hospital. Materials and methods: A retrospective and prospective study was conducted on 136 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound method at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, from 1/2014 to 9/2021. Results: age of patients was 74.5 years. The mean IPSS score was 23.37±7.85. The quality of life (QoL) score was 4.31±1.19. The mean prostate volume was 48.11±18.24ml. After 1 and 6 month of treatment, IPSS score (23.37 decreased to 19.26) and QoL (4.21 decrease to 3.16) score was significantly improve than pre-treatment. Maximum flow rate was more increased than pre-treatment. Good and fair treatment results was over 80%. Conclusions: The High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound treatment (HIFU) is a safe, effective, minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. 

Article Details

Keywords

benign prostatic hyperplasia, high-intensity focused ultrasound system, IPSS

References

1. Hội Tiết Niệu-Thận Học Việt Nam. Hướng dẫn xử trí tăng sinh lành tính tuyến tiền liệt, Nhà xuất bản Y học, Hà Nội. 2019.
2. Kok Bin Lim. Epidemiology of clinical benign prostati hyperplasia, Asian Journal of Urology. 2017. 4(3), 148-151, doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.06.004.
3. Lê Thanh Bình. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và đánh giá kết quả điều trị tăng sinh lành tính tuyến tiền liệt bằng hệ thống siêu âm hội tụ cường độ cao tại Bệnh viện Trường Đại Học Y Dược Cần Thơ năm 2019-2021. Luận văn cao học. Trường Đại Học Y Dược Cần Thơ. 2021.
4. Toyoaki Uchida, Hisataka Kyunou, Masatoshi Muramoto, Masatsugu Iwamura, Shin Egawa, Ken Koshiba. Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: Preliminary report. Urology. 1998. 52(1), 66-71, doi: 10.1016/s00904295(98)00118-6.
5. Ebert T, Miller S, Graefen M, Saddeler D, Schmitz-Dräger B, Ackermann R. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), Keio J Med. 1995. 44(4), pp. 146-9. doi: 10.2302/kjm.44.146.
6. Mulligan ED, Mulvin D Lynch TH, Greene D, Smith JM, Fitzpatrick JM. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Urol. 1997. 79(2), 177-180.
doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.03286.x.
7. Stephan Madersbacher, Bob Djavan, Georg Schatzl, Thomas Stulnig, Michael Marberger. Long-term outcome of transrectal highintensity focused ultrasound therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol. 2000. 37(6), 687-694, doi: 10.1159/000020219.
8. Stephan Madersbacher, Martin Susani, Christian Kratzik, Michael Marberger. Tissue ablation in benign prostatic hyperplasia with high intensity focused ultrasound. The journal of urology. 1994. 152, pp. 1956-1961, doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32278-4.