EVALUATING CLINICAL PHARMACY INTERVENTIONS IN VANCOMYCIN THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING AT HOAN MY SAI GON HOSPITAL IN 2023–2025
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Clinical pharmacy interventions in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin play an important role in optimizing treatment efficacy. Since early 2024, Hoan My Sai Gon Hospital has implemented clinical pharmacy interventions to improve TDM practices for vancomycin. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of clinical pharmacy interventions in vancomycin TDM. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 214 inpatient medical records involving vancomycin use, divided into two phases: pre-intervention (01/01/2023–31/12/2023) and post-intervention (01/03/2024–28/02/2025), with 107 records in each group. Results: The baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar: median age was comparable, over 67% of patients were aged ≥60, more than 50% were overweight/obese, and 50% had normal eGFR. Statistically significant differences were observed in Charlson score and laboratory parameters including white blood cell count, platelet count, CRP, and PCT (p < 0.05). Clinical pharmacy interventions increased the rate of TDM implementation from 35.7% to 65.2% (p < 0.0001) and improved the appropriateness of TDM indication from 48.6% to 82.9% (p < 0.0001). However, no significant difference was observed in the proportion of patients achieving target AUC/MIC values (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Clinical pharmacy interventions significantly improved TDM implementation and appropriateness of TDM indications for vancomycin, though they did not markedly increase the rate of achieving target AUC/MIC.
Keywords
Vancomycin, TDM, clinical pharmacy intervention, Hoan My Sai Gon
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
2. Rybak MJ, Le J, Lodise TP, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious MRSA infections: revised consensus guideline. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020. 77(11), 835-864. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa036
3. Võ T Hà, Nguyễn T Anh, Phạm K Anh, et al. Đánh giá mức độ tuân thủ TDM vancomycin trước và sau khi có sự tham gia của dược sĩ lâm sàng tại khoa HSTC-CĐ, Bệnh viện Nguyễn Tri Phương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2022. 520(2).
4. Lê TM Hằng, Nguyễn HA(b), Nguyễn TT Cúc, et al. Hiệu chỉnh liều vancomycin thông qua giám sát nồng độ thuốc với đích AUC dựa trên ước đoán Bayesian ở bệnh nhân hồi sức ngoại khoa, Bệnh viện Hữu Nghị Việt Đức. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023. 525(1A), 176-180.
5. Trần V Anh, Nguyễn TT Phương, Nguyễn HA(b), et al. Phân tích tình hình sử dụng và giám sát nồng độ vancomycin trong máu trên bệnh nhân người lớn tại Bệnh viện đa khoa Quốc tế Hải Phòng. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2022. 511, 270-274.
6. Bệnh viện Hoàn Mỹ Sài Gòn. Quy trình theo dõi nồng độ vancomycin trong máu theo phương pháp đo hai nồng độ đỉnh/đáy. Quy trình hoạt động chuẩn HMSG-PHA-GEN-003. 2021.
7. Nguyễn T Vũ, Phạm TT Duy, Lê TT Phúc, et al. Hiệu chuẩn liều vancomycin theo mô hình Bayesian ở bệnh nhân nội trú người lớn. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2024. 20(2), 45-52.
8. Lu H, Duan L, Yu Y, et al. Optimization of the vancomycin administration regimen by clinical pharmacists based on a population pharmacokinetics model: a prospective interventional study. J Chemother. 2022. 34(7), 446-458. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2022.2086305.
9. Robinson JF, Wang E, Zhu W, et al. Implementation of AUC-guided vancomycin monitoring and its impact on clinical outcomes. Pharmacotherapy. 2023. 43(2),201-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.30968/rbfhss.2024.152.1157.
10. Pan L, Liu J, Xu S, et al. Clinical pharmacist services on vancomycin therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2023. 14,1186658. doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1186658.
11. Abdelmessih YS, Sherif Z, Shah S, et al. AUC- versus trough-guided vancomycin dosing and risk of acute kidney injury: meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022. 77(12),3391-3399. doi:10.1093/jac/dkac366.