EVALUATION OF PARTIAL CLOSURE AND COMPLETE CLOSURE TECHNIQUES IN THE SURGICAL EXTRACTION OF MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS CLASSIFIED AS TYPE IIA ACCORDING TO PELL AND GREGORY AT THE CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL IN 2023-2025

Tran Diem Trinh Le1, , Ngoc Phuong Thao Tran2, Viet My Pham1, Thi Phuong Thao Nguyen2
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Van Lang University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Impacted mandibular wisdom teeth often cause complications such as gingivitis, abscesses, cellulitis, osteomyelitis, and sepsis, necessitating extraction. This common procedure carries a complication rate between 4.6% and 30.9%, including damage to adjacent teeth and tissues, jaw fractures, swelling, pain, trismus, dry socket, and infections. Selecting an appropriate surgical method is crucial to minimize these risks. Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of partial versus complete closure techniques in mandibular wisdom tooth extraction. Materials and methods: A crosssectional descriptive study with clinical intervention and control group was conducted on 70 patients with Class II A mandibular wisdom teeth, according to Pell and Gregory classification, at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from May 2023 to March 2025. Results: The mean operative time for the partial closure group (14.83±1.6 minutes) was significantly shorter than that of the primary closure group (19.37±2.3 minutes) (p<0.001). The partial closure group also reported significantly lower pain scores on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 (p<0.05). Horizontal and vertical facial swelling significantly increased on days 1 and 3 postoperatively but gradually subsided to near baseline by day 7 (p<0.001); vertical swelling difference was not statistically significant on day 7 (p=0.084). Conclusion: These findings highlight the advantages of partial wound closure in reducing surgical time, postoperative pain, and facial swelling following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars classified as Pell and Gregory class IIA. 

Article Details

References

1. Pinto A.C., Francisco H., Marques D., Martins J.N., Caramês J. Worldwide Prevalence and Demographic Predictors of Impacted Third Molars Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024. 13(24), 7533, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247533.
2. Syed K.B., Alshahrani F.S., Alabsi W.S., Hameed M.S., Mustafa A.B. Prevalence of Distal Caries in Mandibular Second Molar Due to Impacted Third Molar. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. 11(3), 28-30, https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/18582.9509.
3. Yamada S.I., Hasegawa T., Yoshimura N., Hakoyama Y., Nitta T., et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for postoperative complications after lower third molar extraction. A multicenter prospective observational study in Japan. 2022. 101(32), 89-99, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029989.
4. Mahat A.K, Yadav R . A Comparative Study of the Effect of Sutureless Versus Multiple Sutures Technique on Complications following Third Molar Surgery in Nepalese Subpopulation. Int J Dent. 2020. 476, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9314762.
5. Alsaegh M.A., Abushweme D.A., Ahmed K.O., Ahmed S.O. The pattern of mandibular third molar impaction and its relationship with the development of distal caries in adjacent second molars among Emiratis: A retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2022. 22(1), 306, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02338-4.
6. Alkadi S., Stassen L. Effect of One-Suture and Sutureless Techniques on Postoperative Healing After Third Molar Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019. 77(4), 703-716, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.12.001.
7. Azab M., Ibrahim S., Khosravirad A. Efficacy of secondary vs primary closure techniques for the prevention of postoperative complications after impacted mandibular third molar extractions: A systematic review update and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2022. 153(10), 943-956, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2022.04.007.
8. Arandi N.Z., Jarrar A. Association between mandibular third molar impactions and distal carious lesions on the adjacent second molars: A cross-sectional study. J Int Med Res. 2025. 53(3), 1- 15, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/03000605251324489.
9. Phạm Hải Đăng, Lâm Nhựt Tân. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, X-quang và đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nhổ răng khôn hàm dưới lệch kết hợp sử dụng Dexamethasone dạng tiêm ở bệnh nhân tại Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ năm 2021-2022. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2023. 1(54), 181-188, https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2022i54.376.
10. Vipin A., Meenaxi U., Baliga S. Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2021. 21, 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2021.073.
11. Rodrigues É.D.R., Martins-de-Barros A.V., Loureiro A.M.L.C., Carvalho M.D.V., Vasconcelos B. Comparison of two suture techniques on the inflammatory signs after third molars extraction-A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2023. 18(6), 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286413.