COMPARATIVE RESULTS OF PERCUTANEOUS AND OPEN SURGERY FOR TRIGGER FINGERS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Trigger finger is a common condition, affecting 10-16% of fingers, and is a condition of flexor tendonitis or flexor tendon sheath disease. Trigger finger pain is treated with minimally invasive and very effective methods and is often widely used. Objective: To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of trigger finger in the minimally invasive percutaneous intervention and open surgery groups. Compare the treatment results of trigger finger by minimally invasive percutaneous intervention and open surgery. Materials and methods: Cohort study on 99 patients diagnosed with trigger finger, divided into 2 groups at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from June 2023 to March 2025. Results: The disease was common in middle age, often in women, in the thumb. Clinically, the pain level (VAS score) in groups A and B were 7.00 ± 0.677 and 7.12 ± 0.718, respectively. Small masses were palpable in all cases (100%). Ultrasound of peritendinous fluid in group A accounted for 40.8%, group B 48%; the thickness of the A1 pulley in group A was 1.304 ± 0.484, group B 1.410 ± 0.419. The pain level (VAS score), after 1 week, group A was 1.47 ± 0.649, group B was 2.10 ± 0.763, the difference was statistically significant. VAS assessment in the following weeks showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Both minimally invasive and open surgical treatments for trigger finger have shown good results. However, minimally invasive treatments with 18-gauge needles have been shown to result in less postoperative pain and less scarring.
Keywords
Trigger finger, percutaneous release, 18 gauge needle, comparative results
Article Details
References
2. Salim N., Abdullah S., Sapuan J., and Haflah N.H.M. Outcome of corticosteroid injection versus physiotherapy in the treatment of mild trigger fingers. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012.37(1), 27-34, https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193411415343.
3. Bruijnzeel H., Neuhaus V., Fostvedt S., Jupiter J. B., Mudgal C. S., and Ring D. C. Adverse events of open A1 pulley release for idiopathic trigger finger. The Journal of hand surgery. 2012.37(8), 1650-165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.014.
4. Guo D., McCool L., Senk, A., Tonkin, B., Guo, J., et al. Minimally invasive thread trigger digit release: a preliminary report on 34 digits of the adult hands. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2018.43(9), 942-947, https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418774497.
5. Huang H. K., Wang J. P., Lin C. J., Huang Y. C., Huang T. F., and Chang M. C. Short-term versus long-term outcomes after open or percutaneous release for trigger thumb. Orthopedics. 2017.40(1), 131-135, https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20161017-06.
6. Orhan SS. Percutaneous Surgical Treatment of Trigger Finger. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024.59(4), 580-583, https://doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788670.
7. Đào Xuân Thành, Someth, Nguyễn Văn Hoạt. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật điều trị bệnh lý ngón tay lò xo tại Bệnh viện đại học Y Hà Nội. Tạp chí Y Học Việt Nam. 2022. 511(2), 242-246, https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v511i2.2166.
8. Nguyễn Quốc Huy, Trương Đồng Tâm, Thân Thị Thu, Âu Thị Kim Chung. Đánh giá kết quả ban đầu điều trị bệnh ngón tay bật bằng phẫu thuật tại bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y khoa Thái Nguyên. Tạp chí khoa học & công nghệ đại học Thái Nguyên. 2017. 165(5), 77-80.
9. Nguyễn Thành Tấn. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị ngón tay cò súng bằng phuơng pháp can thiệp tối thiểu qua da với kim 18. Tạp chí Y Dược học Quân Sự. 2015. 6, 143-148.
10. Guerini. H et al. Sonograaphic Appearance of Trigger Fingers. J Ultrasound Med.1407 - 1413.
11. El-Deek AMF, Hassan Dawood EMAE-H. Role of ultrasonography in evaluation of tendons abnormalities in hand and fingers. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nucler Medicine. 2019. 50(1), 108-111.
12. Baek J. H., Chung D. W., and Lee J. H. Factors causing prolonged postoperative symptoms despite absence of complications after A1 pulley release for trigger finger, The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2019. 44(4), 338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.023.