Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 253
COMPLETENESS, TIMELINESS OF ONLINE REPORTS ON ELECTRONIC COMMUNICABLE DISEASE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM IN SOME MEDICAL FACILITIES IN VINH LONG PROVINCE IN 2022
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The infectious disease surveillance management system (eCDS) has been implemented since 2016 but the completeness and timeliness of communicable disease reporting are still low. Objectives: Elevate the completeness and timeliness of online infectious disease reporting according to eCDS in Vinh Long province in 2022. Materials and methods: The cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at 27/126 medical facilities including public and private systems in Vinh Long province from evaluating. Information collected from 545 case reports, 528 weekly reports, 120 monthly reports, and 36 outbreak reports were recorded on the eCDS system and evaluated through a checklist of criteria for timeliness and completeness. Results: Timeliness: 38.9% of cases reported on time; 83.7% was reported the week on time, 50.8% reported the month on time, and 2.6% reported the outbreak on time. Completeness: For the information field: case reports reached the rate of 76.7%; weekly reports at 100% rate; monthly reports at 100% rate; outbreak reports a rate of 91.7%; For the number of the report with sufficient information: case reports reach the rate of 0%; weekly reports at 100% rate; monthly reports at 100% rate; outbreak report a rate of 13.9%; Verification Factor (VF): case reports of 1.3% value; a weekly was valid 1; a monthly was valid 1; The outbreak report was value 1. Accuracy: For the information field: the case report reached the rate of 50.0%; weekly reports at 100% rate; monthly reports the rate of 75.0%; outbreak report 50.0% rate. Conclusion: The quality of infectious disease reporting by health facilities in Vinh Long province is still low.
Article Details
Keywords
infectious diseases, infectious disease surveillance and management system, data quality
References
2. Đỗ Kiến Quốc và cộng sự (2017), Thực trạng triển khai hệ thống báo cáo bệnh truyền nhiễm trực tuyến tại khu vực phía Nam năm 2017. Tạp chí Y học dự phòng, Tập 27(Số 11 - 2017), tr.385.
3. Lã Tiến Sơn (2017), Đánh giá hoạt động báo cáo bệnh truyền nhiễm theo Thông tư 54/2015/TT-BYT tại huyện Việt Yên và huyện Tân Yên, tỉnh Bắc Giang năm 2016, Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y tế công cộng, Trường Đại học Y tế công cộng, Hà Nội.
4. Nguyễn Mạnh Tuấn và cộng sự (2019), Thực trạng hệ thống thông tin cảnh báo dịch bệnh truyền nhiễm và sự kiện y tế công cộng tại tỉnh Quảng Ninh năm 2019. Tạp chí Khoa học Nghiên cứu Sức khỏe và Phát triển, Tập 3(Số 4-2019), tr.99-107.
5. G. W. Rutherford (1998), Public health, communicable diseases, and managed care: Will managed care improve or weaken communicable disease control?. Am J Prev Med, 14(3 Suppl), pp. 53-59.
6. H. N. Perry và các cộng sự. (2007), Planning an integrated disease surveillance and response system: a matrix of skills and activities. BMC Med, 5, pp.24.
7. N. Fadaei Dehcheshmeh và các cộng sự. (2016), Survey of Communicable Diseases Surveillance System in Hospitals of Iran: A Qualitative Approach. Glob J Health Sci, 8(9), pp.44-57.
8. R. A. Jajosky và S. L. Groseclose (2004), Evaluation of reporting timeliness of public health surveillance systems for infectious diseases. BMC Public Health, 4, pp.29.
9. R. Abiy và các cộng sự. (2018), A Comparison of Electronic Medical Record Data to Paper Records in Antiretroviral Therapy Clinic in Ethiopia: What is affecting the Quality of the Data?. Online J Public Health Inform, 10(2), pp.212.
10. Senait Kebede và các cộng sự. (2011), Strengthening systems for communicable disease surveillance: creating a laboratory network in Rwanda. Health Research Policy and Systems, 9(1), pp.27.