SATISFACTION WITH THE TRAINING PROGRAM IN FAMILY MEDICINE: A SELF REPORT OF THE RESIDENTS IN CAN THO, VIETNAM
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Family medicine is a broad specialty, requiring a diverse and appropriate training program. At Can Tho UMP, the curriculum has been regularly reviewed and updated. Objectives: To determine the satisfaction rate of students with the training programs and analyze some related factors. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional description on the sample selected from 2 courses (starting in 2021 and 2022), with some modifications in list of subjects and increased time of practice, particularly at outpatient settings in the latter curriculum. The questionnaire consists of 12 items about satisfaction with the theoretical and practical teaching programs, which had high reliability (Cronbach alpha 0.967). The participants were asked to rate from 0-10 in accordance with their satisfaction levels. Results: 72 residents participated in the study. The doctors’ average age was 35.6 (27-56). 63.9% were male, and 73.6% were married. There were 60% of residents who were from preventive doctors, and 62% working in primary care. There were 70.8% and 77.8% of residents who were highly satisfied with the theoretical teaching program and lecturers, and the practice program, respectively. The overall mean score of satisfaction was 8.4 (SD 0.89). Lower satisfaction correlated several personal factors including younger age group, fewer numbers of years after graduation and/or years in working, preventive medicine undergraduate training background, not primary care provider, and the curriculum prior renewal (p < 0.05). Conclusion: the training program should be considered to meet expectations of different groups of residents and maximize the duration of practice.
Keywords
satisfaction, resident, postgraduate training, family medicine
Article Details
References
2. Raghavendran S, Inbaraj LR. Do family physicians suffer an identity crisis? A perspective of family physicians in Bangalore city. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018. 7, 1274-8, DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_149_18.
3. AlShareef MH. Satisfaction of family physicians during their training program, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2014. 2014. 3, 649-659, DOI: 10.5455/ijmsph.2014.260320118.
4. Thuy T. N. Thai., Linh V. Pham., Ly H. Pham., Thanh H. Duong., Minh V. Nguyen. A survey on status and demands of family doctors in Mekong delta region, in the period 2008-2025. Can Tho Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal. 2019. Volume 22-25/2019, 121-128.
5. AbdAli, Mais & Abutiheen, Ali & Ba’aie, Hasan. Assessment of Family Medicine Residents’ Perception about their Specialty and Residency Program in Iraq. Karbala J. Med. 2019. Vol.12, No.1, 4132-4142.
6. Zuhairah, Ammar Abu, et al. Factors affecting Family Medicine residents' perception of achievement of training objectives. Journal of Health Specialties. 2014. vol. 2, no. 3, 114, DOI:10.4103/1658-600X.137887.
7. Kim JH, Kim JY, Kwon KY, Lee CM, Jeon TH, Hyun SS. Satisfaction and difficulties of Korean family medicine resident training faculty. Korean J Fam Med. 2013. 34(5), 357-63, doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.5.357.
8. Tanriover O, Peker S, Hidiroglu S, Kitapcioglu D, Inanici SY, Karamustafalioglu N, Gulpinar MA. The emotions experienced by family medicine residents and interns during their clinical training: a qualitative study. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2023. 24(e25), 1– 8, DOI: 10.1017/S1463423623000051.
9. Taylor D, Picker B, Woolever D, Thayer EK, Carney PA, Galper AB. A Pilot Study to Address Tolerance of Uncertainty Among Family Medicine Residents. Fam Med. 2018. 50(7), 531-538, DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.634768.
10. Crutcher RA, Szafran O, Woloschuk W, Chatur F, Hansen C. Family medicine graduates' perceptions of intimidation, harassment, and discrimination during residency training. BMC Med Educ. 2011. 11(88), DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-88.