APPLICATION OF “VAN HERICK PLUS” WITH IMAGEJ SOFTWARE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ANTERIOR CHAMBER ANGLE

Thai Minh Hieu Le1, , Cong Kiet Nguyen1, Tam Hao Au2
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
2 Ho Chi Minh Eye Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: An evaluation of the Van Herick Plus technique, a method for assessing all 4 quadrants of the anterior chamber using only a slit lamp, which is suitable for primary healthcare facilities. Objective: To evaluate the reliability of “Van Herick Plus” technique combined with ImageJ software in estimating all 4 quadrants of the anterior chamber compared with anterior segment OCT. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of 45 patients above 40 years old was performed to classify anterior chamber angle using Van Herick Plus. Additionally, the iridocorneal angle (ICA) was measured in the upper and lower quadrants using software ImageJ. These patients were also evaluated with AS-OCT to compare. Results: This method showed substantial agreement with anterior segment OCT in classifying angles (κ > 0.7), with the standard for narrow angles on anterior segment OCT being a trabecular iris angle (TIA) ≤ 11.09°. The area under the curve AUC = 0.875, p<0.001   in the upper and lower quadrants indicated that using the ICA to determine narrow angles was a very good test, with an ICA ≤ 9.7° being the optimal criterion value when evaluating the angle as narrow, with a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 80.6%. Conclusion: This is a simple technique that does not require much modern equipment, the operations are easy to perform and easy for training. The results has substantial agreement with AS-OCT.

Article Details

References

1. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators et al., Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: The Right to Sight: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet Global Health. 2021. 9(2), e144–e160, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7.
2. C. Barbour-Hastie, S. S. Deol, A. Peroni, S. Gillan, E. Trucco, and A. J. Tatham, Feasibility of Automated Gonioscopy Imaging in Clinical Practice. Journal of Glaucoma. 2023. 32(3), 159, doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002162.
3. I. Riva et al., Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques: A Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 12, Art. no. 12, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/jcm9123814.
4. R. Sihota et al., ‘Van Herick Plus’: a modified grading scheme for the assessment of peripheral anterior chamber depth and angle. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019. 103(7), 960–965, doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312132.
5. X. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Tang, X. Sun, and Y. Chen, Optical coherence tomography analysis of anterior segment parameters before and after laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects by using CASIA2. BMC Ophthalmology. 2022. 22, doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02366-2.
6. S. Amin et al., The Limbal Niche and Regenerative Strategies. Vision. 2021. 5(4), doi:
10.3390/vision5040043.
7. M. K. Walker, M. M. Schornack, and S. J. Vincent, Anatomical and physiological considerations in scleral lens wear: Conjunctiva and sclera. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2020. 43(6), 517–528, doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.06.005.
8. S. Taurone et al., Age related changes seen in human cornea in formalin fixed sections and on biomicroscopy in living subjects: A comparison. Clinical Anatomy. 2020. 33(2), 245–256, doi:
10.1002/ca.23488.