THE RATE AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF DIFFICULT INTUBATION AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Difficult intubation poses a significant challenge in airway management. Although various predictive risk factors exist, no gold standard accurately predicts this condition. Difficult intubation can result in failed tube placement; therefore, anesthesiologists must be thoroughly prepared to manage unexpected situations. Objectives: To determine the incidence of difficult intubation, investigate predictive risk factors, and examine complications that occur during intubation at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital. Materials and methods: This prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2023 to May 2024 on 334 surgical patients who underwent intubation under anesthesia. Results: The incidence of difficult intubation was 5.1% based on the Cormack-Lehane classification. Patients with two or more predictive risk factors, especially those who were obese or had a short neck, faced challenges during intubation. 2.1% of cases required intubation on the third attempt. The main complications included early injuries (3%), such as lip and tongue lacerations and pharyngeal abrasions, as well as late complications (3.3%) like edema and hoarseness. Additionally, there were three cases of bronchospasm, two of which were associated with difficult intubation. Conclusions: Accurate assessment of the risk of difficult intubation is crucial for developing appropriate management plans. Moreover, anesthesiologists must be well-equipped and proficient in using supportive tools to manage the airway effectively.
Keywords
Difficult intubation, Cormack-Lehane, obesity, short neck
Article Details
References
2. Mohamed Naguib, Franklin L. Scamman, Cormac O'Sullivan et all. Predictive Performance of Three Multivariate Difficult Tracheal Intubation Models: A double- Blind,Case-Controlled Study. Anesth Analg. 2006.102, 818-824, Doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000196507.19771.b2
3. R. Freedman, L. Herbert, A. O’Donnell, N. Ross, I. H. Wilson, và K. G. Allman, B.t.v. Oxford Handbook of Anaesthesia 5th. Oxford University Press. 2022, 223-224, Doi: 10.1093/med/9780198853053.001.0001.
4. Nguyễn Phú Vân. Nghiên cứu các yếu tố tiên lượng và một số phương pháp xử trí đặt nội khí quản khó trên bệnh nhân có bệnh đường thở trong phẫu thuật tai mũi họng. Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2018. 50.
5. Huỳnh Tuấn Hải. Nghiên cứu các yếu tố tiên lượng đặt nội khí quản khó trong gây mê toàn diện. Tạp chí Y học Thực hành. 2016, vol Công trình nghiên cứu khoa học Đại hội gây mê toàn quốc 2016, 28.
6. Nguyễn Văn Chừng và Trần Thị Cẩm Nhung. Nghiên cứu những yếu tố tiên lượng đặt nội khí quản khó trong phẫu thuật tuyến giáp. Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2011, 98.
7. Ngô Văn Dũng. Nghiên cứu các yếu tố tiên lượng đặt nội khí quản khó trong gây mê toàn diện.
Tạp chí Y học Thực hành. 2017, 679(10), 19.
8. B. E. Driver và c.s. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018, 319(21), 2179, doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6496.
9. J. E. Fiadjoe và c.s. Airway management complications in children with difficult tracheal intubation from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry: a prospective cohort analysis. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2016, vol 4(1), 37–48, doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00508-1.
10. R. Park và c.s. The efficacy of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in children who are difficult to intubate: an analysis from the paediatric difficult intubation registry. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017, 119(5), 984–992, doi: 10.1093/bja/aex344.