EVALUATION OF THE PAIN RELIEF RESULTS OF FENTANYL AND PROPOFOL IN COLONOSCOPY AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Pain during colonoscopy is a patient's obsession every time it is mentioned, pain can prolong the procedure time, and cause hemodynamic disturbances. Sedation helps provide optimal pain relief, minimize complications and shorten recovery time afterward. Objectives: To evaluate the analgesic effectiveness, side effects of fentanyl and propofol, and patient satisfaction level in colonoscopy. Materials and methods: The prospective and cross-sectional description study was performed on 230 patients with indications for painless colonoscopy at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from November 2021 to November 2022. Results: Average age was 55.58 ± 13.95 years, doses of fentanyl and propofol were 50.74 ± 5.75 mcg and 137.52 ± 44.69 mg, respectively, procedure time was 18.63 ± 7.79 minutes, 31.3% of patients had cardiovascular comorbidities, 29.56% had hypotension during colonoscopy, 99.13% were satisfied and very satisfied with the pain relief effect. Conclusions: Using fentanyl and propofol in colonoscopy is safe and effective with patient’s very high satisfaction.
Keywords
Colonoscopy, sedation, satisfaction
Article Details
References
2. Robert Sneyd and et at. Hypotension during propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a retrospective exploratory analysis and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022. 128(4), 610-622, doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.044.
3. Phạm Thị Nga. Đánh giá mức độ hài lòng của người bệnh nội soi đại tràng không gây mê có can thiệp Điều dưỡng tại Bệnh viện Đại học Y Thái Bình năm 2019, Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng. 2020. 3(4), 16-22.
4. Xiaojun, Zhao, Wang Xin, Li Aiqin, Yang Lang Sheng Jianqiu. Outcome and safety analysis of colonoscopy in 1249 patients aged 80 years and over. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Year. 2016. 9, 968-970.
5. Ogundipe và S Kar-Purkayastha. Colonoscopy In Patients Older Than 75: Experience From A District General Hospital Targeting Symptomatic Patients, The Internet Journal of Geriatrics and Gerontology. 2005. 3, 1-5.
6. James E. Duncan and et at. Colonoscopy in the elderly: low risk, low yield in asymptomatic patients, Dis Colon Rectum. 2006. 49(5), 646-51, doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0306-3.
7. Lawren B Cohen and et at. Propofol for endoscopic sedation: A protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist, Gastrointest Endosc. 2003. 58(5), 725-32, doi:
10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02010-8.
8. Stojanka Gasparovic and et at. Clinical analysis of propofol deep sedation for 1,104 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a three year prospective study, World J Gastroenterol. 2006. 12(2), 327-30, doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i2.327.
9. Phạm Thị Hà Thanh. Nghiên cứu ứng dụng nội soi đại tràng không đau với propofol và fentanyl, Tạp chí Hội nghị Gây mê hồi sức Tp. Hồ Chí Minh. 69 - 75. 2014.
10. Võ Xuân Quang. Nghiên cứu ứng dụng nội soi đại tràng không đau với Propofol và Fentanyl Phòng khám Đa khoa Quốc tế Yersin, Tạp chí Hội nghị Gây mê hồi sức Miền Trung. 2014. 141-147.
11. Nguyễn Văn Thịnh. Nghiên cứu ứng dụng nội soi đại tràng không đau với propofol và fentanyl tại Bệnh viện Bưu Điện Hà Nội, Tạp chí Hội nghị Gây mê hồi sức Miền Bắc. 2013. 183-189.
12. Mark R Borgaonkar and et at. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. 2729871, doi: 10.1155/2016/2729871.
13. Juan-Salvador Baudet and et at. Minor adverse events of colonoscopy on ambulatory patients: the impact of moderate sedation, Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009. 21(6), 656-61, doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328314b7e3.
14. Eckardt, A. and et at. Open access colonoscopy in the training setting: which factors affect patient satisfaction and pain?, Endoscopy. 2008. 40(2), 98-105, doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995469.
15. Lucas Chartier and et at. Patient satisfaction with colonoscopy: a literature review and pilot study, Can J Gastroenterol. 2009. 23(3), 203-9, DOI: 10.1155/2009/903545.
16. Upneet K. Nijjar and et at. Patient satisfaction with family physician colonoscopists, J Am Board Fam Med. 2011. 24(1), 51-6, doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.01.100112.