IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS AND VALUE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSING CAUSES OF SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION IN CAN THO CITY IN 2022-2024

Ngoc Nhi Ta1,, Hoang Anh Nguyen2, Anh Quan To1, Thi Anh Thu Pham1, Hung Quoc Tran3
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Can Tho General Hospital
3 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Bowel obstruction is a common surgical emergency, in which small bowel obstruction occurs 3 times more often than large bowel obstruction. Computerized tomography has been considered the main means of imaging diagnosis in bowel obstruction because of its speed and high accuracy. Objectives: To determine the imaging characteristics of small bowel obstruction and the value of computed tomography in diagnosing the cause. Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study, all patients who had computerized tomography of the abdomen with contrast injection and surgery with a clinical diagnosis of small bowel obstruction in Can Tho city from July 2022 to March 2024. Results: The study recorded 122 cases of small bowel obstruction (87 men and 35 women), ranging in age from 16 to 87. The most common causes were adhesions, bands and internal hernia. The two most common signs were dilated bowel loops (100%) and air fluid level (91.8%). Bird beak signs, whirlpool sign, and target signs accounted for a low rate but contributed to diagnose the cause. The causes of tumor, external hernia, and intussusception had high sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The remaining causes had a confidence interval for specificity in the range of 80 - 100%. Conclusions: Computed tomography has good value in diagnosing the cause of small bowel obstruction but still has low sensitivity in diagnosing bowel obstruction due to a number of causes such as volvulus, bandts and adhesions.

Article Details

References

1. Phạm Văn Lình, Phạm Văn Năng. Ngoại cơ sở. Nhà xuất bản đại học Cần Thơ. 2020. 84-92.
2. Silva, A. C., Pimenta, M. và Guimarães, L. S. Small bowel obstruction: what to look for. Radi ographics. 2009. 29(2), 423-39, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.292085514.
3. Trịnh Văn Tuấn. Bệnh học ngoại khoa. Nhà xuất bản y học. 2020. 67-88.
4. Diamond, M., Lee, J. và LeBedis, C. A. Small Bowel Obstruction and Ischemia. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014. 57(4), 689-703, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31076026/.
5. Li Z., Zhang L., Liu X., Yuan F., Song B. Diagnostic utility of CT for small bowel obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiographics. 2019. 14(12), e0226740, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226740.
6. Barmparas G., Branco BC., Schnüriger B., Lam L., Inaba K., et al. The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010. 14(10), 16191628, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1189-8.
7. Nguyễn Văn Khánh, Nguyễn Duy Hùng, Lê Thanh Dũng, Nguyễn Quang Anh, Nguyễn Duy Huề. Giá trị của cắt lớp vi tính 16 dãy trong chẩn đoán tắc ruột. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2019. 481(2), 241-244.
8. Nguyễn Văn Phương. Luận văn nghiên cứu đặc điểm cắt lớp vi tính ở bệnh nhân tắc ruột. Trường Đại học Y dược Huế. 2019. 40.
9. Nguyễn Hoa Huệ, Nguyễn Duy Hùng, Dư Đức Thiện. Giá trị của cắt lớp vi tính đa dãy trong chẩn đoán tắc ruột non. Tạp chí nghiên cứu y học. 2020. 130(6), 91-100.
10. Nguyễn Duy Hùng, Vương Kim Ngân. Đặc điểm hình ảnh và giá trị của cắt lớp vi tính trong chẩn đoán tắc ruột non do thoát vị. Tạp chí y học Việt Nam. 2022. 511(2), 35-39, https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v511i2.2107.
11. Atri, M., McGregor, C., McInnes, M.,Power, N., Rahnavardi, K., et al. Multidetector helical CT in the evaluation of acute small bowel obstruction: comparison of non-enhanced (no oral, rectal or IV contrast) and IV enhanced CT. Eur J Radiol. 2009. 71(1), 135-40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.04.011.