RESEARCHING CLINICAL, SUBCLINICAL FEATURES AND EVALUATING THE RESULT OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY ON TYMPANIC MEMBRANE RETRACTION POCKET PATIENTS AT CAN THO ENT HOSPITAL IN 2022 - 2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Today, diseases of tympanic membrane retraction pockets have become more common, especially in sclerotic and diploic mastoid bone. Endoscopic surgery combined with transcanal route or endoscopic transcanal attico-antrotomy surgery is less invasive than postauricular surgery, ensures clean removal of disease, shortens time of postoperative dry ear, and avoids damage to healthy structure. Objectives: 1. To describe clinical, subclinical features in patients with tympanic membrane retraction pocket. 2. To evaluate the results of endoscopic surgery. Materials and methods: A prospective, interventional study with endoscopic surgery on 30 ears with tympanic membrane retraction pocket. Results: Clinical features: Hearing loss 93.3%, tinnitus 70.0%, otorrhea 66.7%, earache 23.3%, vertigo 6.7%. Computed tomography of the temporal bone: sclerotic mastoid bone 63%, diploic mastoid bone 37%. Pure tone audiogram: average air-conduction hearing threshold 41.2 ± 12.7 dB, average air-bone gaps 23.7 ± 12.1 dB. Average time of postoperative dry ear: 6 ± 2.4 weeks. Conclusion: With endoscopic transcanal attico-antrotomy surgery, we can approach the epitympanum, which is the first area of the pathology. Besides, the mobility of this technique helps us manage different stages of tympanic membrane retraction pocket. This surgery is not only minimally invasive but also highly effective.
Article Details
Keywords
Tympanic membrane retraction pocket, endoscopic surgery, endoscopic transcanal attico-antrotomy surgery
References
2. Lã Qúy Dân, Cao Minh Thành. Tổng quan về các phương pháp điều trị bệnh viêm tai giữa mạn có cholesteatoma. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam. 2022. 521(2), 214-220, https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v521i2.4081. 3. Phạm Thanh Thế, Hồ Mạnh Phương, Hồ Lê Hoài Nhân. Đánh giá hiệu quả phẫu thuật nội soi điều trị xẹp nhĩ giai đoạn 4. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023. 529(1), 55-58, https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v529i1.6239.
4. Bae M.R., Kang W.S., Chung J.W. Comparison of the clinical results of attic cholesteatoma treatment: endoscopic versus microscopic ear surgery. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology. 2019. 12(2), 156-162, doi:10.21053/ceo.2018.00507.
5. Phạm Thanh Thế, Hồ Lê Hoài Nhân, Phạm Kế Kiên. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi khoét chũm tiệt căn trong điều trị viêm xương chũm mạn tính. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023. 529(1), 198-201, https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v529i1.6274.
6. Trần Anh Tuấn. Giá trị của cắt lớp vi tính xương thái dương trong đánh giá màng nhĩ ở bệnh nhân tai xẹp nhĩ. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021. 500(2), 204-209, https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v500i2.393.
7. Shakya D., Nepal A. Transcanal Endoscopic Retrograde Mastoidectomy for Cholesteatoma: A Prospective Study. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. 2021. 102(6), 269-276, doi:10.1177/01455613211009439.
8. Dispenza F., Mistretta A., Gullo F., Riggio F., Martines F. Surgical Management of Retraction Pockets: Does Mastoidectomy have a Role? International Archives Otorhinolaryngology. 2021. 25(1), e12-e17, doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709196.