Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 20/09/2022
Online Published: 20/09/2022
Abstract Views: 107
Views PDF: 67
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2022i51.258
Issue
No. 51 (2022)
Section
Article
How to Cite
Ly, N. L., Ha, V. P., & Ngo, H. T. (2022). CHARACTERISTICS OF CURRENT OF INJURY AND PACEMAKER PARAMETERS IN PATIENTS HAVE BRADYCARDIAC WHO HAVE PERMANENT PACEMAKER INSERTED AT CAN THO CENTRAL GENERAL HOSPITAL. Cantho Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, 51, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2022i51.258

CHARACTERISTICS OF CURRENT OF INJURY AND PACEMAKER PARAMETERS IN PATIENTS HAVE BRADYCARDIAC WHO HAVE PERMANENT PACEMAKER INSERTED AT CAN THO CENTRAL GENERAL HOSPITAL

Ngoc Luan Ly1,, Van Phuc Ha2, Hoang Toan Ngo3
1 Can Tho Cardiovascular Hospital
2 Kien Giang Province’s Department of Health
3 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: The current of injury (COI) appeared when electrode fixation causes myocardial tissue damage. COI appeared in a short time, important in determining electrode stability and values of pacing parameters during implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Objectives: Description of characteristics of COI and pacing parameters in bradyarrhythmia patients with permanent pacemaker inserted at Can Tho Central General Hospital in 2021-2022. Materials and methods: Patients diagnosed with bradycardiac arrhythmias were inserted with a permanent pacemaker at Can Tho Central General Hospital 2021-2022. Results: 37 right atrial leads: The duration of the intracardiac electrogram (IEd-COI) and ST segment elevation (STe-COI) from 157.7±9.1ms and 2.9±1.2mV after turned decreased to 117.6±7.1ms and 1.3±0.4mV (p<0.001) after 10 minutes; 45 right ventricular leads: IEd-COI and STe-COI from 256.7±20.1ms and 11.5±3.2mV after turned decreased to 182.6±17.1ms and 6.4±2.2mV (p<0.001) after 10 minutes. Conclusions: STe-COI, IEd-COI, pacing threshold, impedence decreased after 10 minutes and sensitivity increased after 10 minutes. 

Article Details

Keywords

Current of injury, pacing threshold, sensitivity, impedance, pacemaker permanent

References

1. Chung Tấn Định (2018), “Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị rối loạn nhịp chậm bằng cấy máy tạo nhịp tim vĩnh viễn tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Sóc Trăng”, Luận văn bác sĩ chuyên khoa cấp 2, Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ, Cần Thơ.
2. Nguyễn Tri Thức, Huỳnh Văn Minh (2014), “Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và vai trò máy tạo nhịp hai buồng trong điều trị rối loạn nhịp chậm tại Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy”, Tạp chí Y học TP. Hồ Chí Minh, tập 18, phụ bản số 2.
3. Phùng Đức Thúy (2017), “Nghiên cứu đặc điểm sóng tổn thương và sự biến đổi ngưỡng tạo nhịp tim trong khi cấy máy tạo nhịp”, Luận văn thạc sỹ 2017, Đại học Y Hà Nội.
4. Haghjoo M. (2014), “Prediction of Midterm Performance of Active-Fixation Leads Using Current of Injury”, Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE), Vol 29 (3), pp.231-236.
5. Kusumoto, F. M., Schoenfeld, M. H., Barrett, C., et al. (2018), 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol.11.
6. Luis Molina (2013), “Medium-Term Effects of Septal and Apical Pacing in Pacemaker Dependent Patients: A Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Study”, Pacing Clinical Electrophysiol (PACE), Vol 37, pp.207-214.
7. Redfearn DP, Gula LJ, Klein GJ et al. (2007), “Current of Injury Predicts Acute Performance of Catheter-Delivered Active Fixation Pacing Leads”, Pacing Clinical Electrophysiol (PACE), Vol 30, pp.1438-1444.
8. Shali Shalaimaiti (2018), “Could persistency of current of injury forecast successful active-fixation pacing lead implantation?”, International Journal of Cardiology, 258(2018), pp.121-125.
9. Saxonhouse S.J. (2005), “Current of Injury Predicts Adequate Active Lead Fixation in Permanent Pacemaker/ Defibrillation Leads,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol 45, No 3, pp.412-417.