EVALUATION OF THE TREATMENT RESULTS IN TOOTH LOSS BY FIBER- REINFORCED COMPOSITE BRIDGE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Tooth loss occurs at all ages, causing a disturbance to the chewing system, affecting the life quality of the patients and the restoration of enough teeth is essential. A new minimally invasive method applied to reconstruct tooth loss is fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures. Objective: To evaluate the results in a tooth loss treatment using fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures on patients treating at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital in 2018-2020. Materials and method: Uncontrolled clinical trial on 58 patients including 23 males and 35 females aged 16 to 60 years old with 64 prosthetic units 39 anterior and 25 posterior bridge at Can Tho University of Medicine Hospital after 6 months follow up from March 2018 to May 2020. Results: After installation, 9.,4% achieved good results. After 6 months, 1.6% that had poor durability, 92.2% achieved good results. Conclusion: fiber reinforced composite fixed partial dentures were a good option for restoring lost teeth.
Article Details
Keywords
dental restoration, resin bonded bridge, fiber reinforced composites
References
2. Chen J. H (2005), Clinical evaluation of 546 tetracycline-stained teeth treated with porcelain laminate veneers, Journal of dentistry, 33(1), pp. 3-8.
3. Cvar J. F (2005), Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials., Clinical oral investigations, 9(4), pp. 215-232.
4. Diana W (2012), Analysis of the interdiffusion of resin monomers into pre-polymerized fiber-reinforced composites, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 28(5), pp. 541-547.
5. George G. S (2002), Resin-retained Bridges Re-visited Part 1. History and Indications, Primary dental care 9(3), pp. 87-91.
6. Ijaimi Z. A (2015), Assessment of the Quality of Composite Resin Restorations, Open Journal of Stomatology, 5, pp. 19-25.
7. Izgi A. D (2011), Directly fabricated inlay-retained glass- and polyethylene fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses in posterior single missing teeth: a short-term clinical observation, The journal of adhesive dentistry, 13(4), pp. 383-391.
8. Jansen Van Rensburg J. J (2015), Fibre-Reinforced Composite (FRC) Bridge − A Minimally Destructive Approach, Dent Update, 42(4), pp. 360–366.
9. Kumbuloglu (2015), Clinical survival of indirect, anterior 3-unit surface-retained fibrereinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis: Up to 7.5-years follow-up, Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich, 43(6), pp. 656-663.
10. Malmstrom H (2015), Success, clinical performance and patient satisfaction of direct fibrereinforced composite fixed partial dentures - a two-year clinical study, Journal of oral rehabilitation, 42(12), pp. 906-913.
11. Nguyen T. C (2010), Oral health status of adults in Southern Vietnam a crosssectional epidemiological study, BMC Oral Health 10(2), pp. 1-11.
12. Patel S. B (2004), The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites, Journal of the American Dental Association, 135(5), pp. 587-594.
13. Spinas E (2013), Prosthetic rehabilitation interventions in adolescents with fixed bridges: a 5-year observational study, European journal of paediatric dentistry, 14(1), pp. 59-62.
14. Vallittu P. K (2018), An overview of development and status of fiber-reinforced composites as dental and medical biomaterials, Acta biomaterialia odontologica Scandinavica, 4(1), pp. 44-55.
15. Van Heumen C. C (2010), Five-year survival of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures in the posterior area, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 26(10), pp. 954-960.