EVALUATION OF THE TREATMENT RESULTS OF CLEFT LIP WITH TENNISON TECHNIQUE AT CAN THO EYE AND ODONTO – STOMATOLOGY HOSPITAL, 2018 – 2019
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Orofacial cleft is the most common craniofacial malformation in the newborns. Patients who have cleft lip are affected on muti aspects including speech communication abilities, hearing, appearance and cognition, which could lead to long-lasting adverse outcomes on their metal and physical health. Objectives: To investigate the clinical characteristics and evaluate the results of cleft lip treatment with Tennison technique at Can Tho Hospital Eyes and OdontoStomalogy in 2018-2020. Materials and methods: Clinical cases followed up longitudinal on 32 patients with 19 males and 13 females who were diagnosed with cleft lips and recalled after 1 week and 6 months. Results: The age of subjects at time lip repair ranged from 6 months – 1 year (50%), the percentage of males (59.4%) higher than females (40.6%), the left cleft occupies more (56.2%), after 1 week of surgery, good rate of the healing and scars were 87.5% and skin flap was 100%. Overall surgical results after 1 week and 6 months were 96.9%, respectively. Conclusions: The Tennison technique brought good results for unilateral cleft lip.
Article Details
Keywords
Cleft lip surgery, Tennison, Unilateral cleft lip
References
2. Mai Đình Hưng (1972), Tổng kết 14 năm điều trị khe hở môi bẩm sinh tại khoa Răng Hàm Mặt Bệnh viện Việt Đức, Nội san Răng hàm mặt, 2, tr 35-51.
3. Bùi Đức Thành (2017), Đánh giá kết quả tạo hình chữ Z trong phương pháp Millard điều trị khe hở môi toàn bộ một bên tại bệnh viện Răng hàm mặt trung ương Hà Nội năm 2016 – 2017 , Luận văn bác sĩ chuyên khoa II, Đại học y Hà Nội.
4. Nguyễn Hùng Vĩ (1997), So sánh kết quả mổ khe hở môi trên một bên bẩm sinh giữa phương pháp Millard và Tennison – Oboukhova cải tiến tại bệnh viện trung ương quân đội 108 từ
1970 – 1996, Luận án thạc sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y Khoa Hà Nội.
5. Adekunle Moses Adetayo (2019), Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment, J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45(3), pp 141-51.
6. Assuncao A. G (1992), The V.L.S. classiíĩcation for secondary deformities in the unilateral cleft lip: clinical application, Br J Pirast Surg, 45(2), pp 293-6.
7. Borsky J (2012), Successful early neonatal repair of cleft lip within fírst 8 days of life, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngorogy, 16(2), pp 1616-26.
8. Omar G.S (2006), Prevalence of a Simonart’s Band in Patients With Complete Cleft Lip and Alveolus and Complete Cleft Lip and Palate, Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 43, pp 442-5.
9. Onder Tan (2007), Triangular with Alanasi repair of unilateral cleft lips: a personal technique and early outcomes, J Craniofac Surg, 18(1), pp 186.
10. Rajanikanth B.R (2012), Assessment of deformities of the Lip and Nose in Cleft Lip Alveolus and Palate Patients by a Rating Scale, J Maxilỉofac Oral Surg, 11(3), pp 38-46.
11. Raymond Tse (2012), Unilateral Cleft Lip: Principles and Practice of Surgical Management, Semin Plast Surg, 26(4), pp 145-156.
12. Srinivas G.R (2013), Assessment of nostril symmetry after primary cleft rhinoplasty in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 41(1), pp 147-152.
13. Taiwo O. A (2013), Surgical outcome and complications following cleft lip and palate repair in a teaching hospital in Nigeria, Afr J Paediatr Surg, 10(4), pp 345-357.
14. Yoav Kaufman (2012), Cleft Nasal Deformity and Rhinoplasty, Semin Plast Surg, 26(4), pp 184-190.