COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CANINE RETRACTION USING NITI CLOSED COIL SPRING AND ELASTIC CHAIN AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Canine retraction and space closure is considered the most time-consuming phase in orthodontic treatment. Acceleration of this step would reduce overall treatment time, improve patient cooperation, and decrease possible negative side effects. The wide use of NiTi coil springs for canine retraction can be attributed to their relatively constant force delivery, hence, reducing the number of appliance reactivations. On the other hand, elastomeric chains deliver an interrupted force that provides periods of rest allowing for regeneration and better tolerance of the supporting tissues. Objectives: To compare postextraction space closure speed using two different sliding mechanisms, Niti closed coil spring and elastic chain within treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) with split-mouth designs was conducted on 31 patients with indications for first premolar extraction. Sampling method: convenient sampling selected all patients who came to the Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from August 2022 to September 2023 who met the sample selection criteria.
Results: The percentage of female patients was 75.8%, and the most popular chief complaint was related to aesthetics (64,5%).The speed of Niti closed coil spring was faster than elastic chain group 1.3 times. Conclusions: Niti closed coil spring lead to faster closure of postextraction spcaes in relation to elastic chain.
Article Details
Keywords
Niti closed coil spring, elastic chain, canine retraction
References
2. Davidovic M., Savic M., Arbutina A. Examination of postex- traction space closure speed using elastic chains and NiTi closed coil springs. Serbian Dent J, 2018, (65), 179–183, http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sdj-2018-0017.
3. Mohammed H., Rizk M.Z., Wafaie K., et al. Effectiveness of nickel-titanium springs vs elastomeric chains in orthodontic space closure: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2018, (21), 12–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12210.
4. Makhlouf M., et al. Evaluating the Amount of Tooth Movement and Root Resorption during Canine Retraction with Friction versus Frictionless Mechanics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2021, 6 (2), 384-388, https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.066.
5. Maria Colceriu et al. Clinical indications and radiation doses of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Med Pharm Rep, 2019, 92(4), 346-351, http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1434.
6. Ardani I., Heswari Danitya, Alida Alida. The correlation between Class I, II, III dental and skeletal malocclusion in ethnic Javanese: A cross sectional study. J Int Oral Health, 2020, 12 (3), 248-252, http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JIOH.JIOH_193_19.
7. Nguyễn Mỹ Huyền. Nghiên cứu tình hình và đánh giá kết quả điều trị sai lệch khớp cắn loại I Angel bằng khí cụ cố định ở sinh viên Răng Hàm Mặt Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ năm 2016-2018. Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ. 2018. 1-45.
8. Trương Thị Bích Ngân. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, Xquang sai khớp cắn loại I Angle và đánh giá hiệu quả gia tốc di chuyển răng nanh hàm trên có kết hợp huyết tương giàu tiểu cầu tại Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ năm 2019 – 2021. 2021. Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ.
9. Talwar A., Bhat S. Comparative evaluation of Nickel- Titaniumclosed coil spring and Elastomeric chain for canine retraction. A randomized clinical trial. IOSR-JDMS, 2018, (17), 7075, http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/0853-1710097075.
10. Haya A. Barsouma, Hend S. ElSayedb, Fouad A. El Sharabyc, et al. Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod, 2021, 91(4), 441–448, https://doi.org/10.2319/110620-916.1.
11. Conti, A. C. De C. F; Vitto, C. De; Conceição, L. F; Dourado, G. B; Volpato, G. H; et al. Force degradation of nickel-titanium closed coil springs: an in vitro . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 10, p. e2669108488,2020.DOI:0.33448/rsdv9i10.8488.
12. Nightingale C, Jones SP. A clinical investigation of force delivery systems for orthodontic space closure. J Orthod. 2003, 30, 229–236.
13. Al Suleiman M, Shehadah M. Comparison of two methods for canine retraction depending on direct skeletal anchorage system (CR-DSAS) Int J Dent Oral Health. 2015;1:7–18.