EVALUATING THE RESULTS OF TRACHEOSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH VENTILATOR ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA AT CAN THO GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2019-2021

Minh Loc Vo1, , Trieu Viet Nguyen1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

  Background: Object patients with ventilator associated pneumonia are often severe patients who need prolonged mechanical ventilation. Many studies have shown that tracheostomy facilitates easier weaning from ventilatory support. To learn do patients with ventilator associated pneumonia benefit from tracheostomy? We conducted a topic to evaluate the results of tracheostomy in patients with ventilator associated pneumonia at Can Tho General Hospital in 2019-2021. Objectives: Survey on some clinical characteristics and evaluate the results of tracheostomy in patients with ventilator associated pneumonia. Materials and methods: To descriptive prospective and clinical interventional study on 60 patients with ventilator associated pneumonia from 03/2019 to 03/2021. Results: Hlegm properties of patients before surgery: Clear 1.7%, cloudy 26.7%, purulent 71.7%. Time of preoperative mechanical 15.5 ± 9.71 days. Bleeding at surgery 11.7%. The most common postoperative complication is tracheostomy tube leg infection 55%. Results after tracheostomy good 31.7%, average 30% and bad 38.3%. The rate of purulent phlegm after surgery on the first day decreased by 23.4%, the third day decreased by 31.7% and the seventh day decreased by 41.7% compared to before surgery. Conclusion: Tracheostomy leads to better airway care and improvement of pulmonary ventilation in patients with ventilator associated pneumonia.

Article Details

References

1. Lê Thiện Chí & Trần Minh Trường (2018), Đánh giá tình hình mở khí quản tại khoa Tai Mũi Họng bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy, Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh. 22(1), tr.122-124.
2. Nguyễn Quang Huy, Mai Xuân Hiên, Tô Vũ Khương, và cộng sự (2018), Đánh giá ưu điểm, biến chứng của mở khí quản nong qua da dưới hướng dẫn nội soi khí quản ống mềm, Y Dược Học Quân Sự. 1, tr.113-119.
3. Lê Thanh Phong, Nguyễn Hữu Dũng (2013), Đánh giá sự lành thương của phương pháp mở khí quản kiểu chữ U ngược, Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh. 17(1), tr.125-130.
4. Đỗ Quyết, Phạm Thái Dũng (2013), Đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng của viêm phổi thở máy tại khoa hồi sức tích cực bệnh viện 103, Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh. 17(3), tr.131-135.
5. Lâm Chánh Thi, Trần Thị Bích Liên (2014), Khảo sát niêm mạc khí quản ở bệnh nhân mở khí quản sau đặt nội khí quản, Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh. 18(1), tr.233-241.
6. Nguyễn Văn Tú, Lê Công Định (2015), Nghiên cứu đặc điểm chức năng thông khí trên bệnh nhân bệnh lý sọ não được mở khí quản thở máy, Đại học Y Dược Hà Nội.
7. Abe T., Madotto F., Pham T. et al. (2018), Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries, Critical Care. 22(1), pp.195.
8. Adly A., Youssef T. A., El-Begermy M. M. et al. (2018), Timing of tracheostomy in patients with prolonged endotracheal intubation: A systematic review, European Archives of OtoRhino-Laryngology. 275(3), pp.679-690.
9. El-Anwar M. W., Nofal A. A.-F., Shawadfy M. A. E. et al. (2017), Tracheostomy in the Intensive Care Unit: A University Hospital in a Developing Country Study, Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 21(01), pp.33-37.
10. Jarosz K., Kubisa B., Andrzejewska A. et al. (2017), Adverse outcomes after percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in intensive care patients: Case series and literature review, Therapeutics and clinical risk management. 13, pp.975-981.
11. Khammas A. H. & Dawood M. R. (2018), Timing of Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Unit Patients, Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 22(04), pp.437-442.
12. Mehta A. B., Cooke C. R., Wiener R. S. et al. 2016), Hospital Variation in Early Tracheostomy in the United States: A Population-Based Study, Critical care medicine. 44(8), pp.1506-1514.
13. Nakarada-Kordic I., Patterson N., Wrapson J. et al. (2018), A Systematic Review of Patient and Caregiver Experiences with a Tracheostomy, The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. 11(2), pp.175-191.