ABILITY PREDICTION OBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE OF THE EXTENSIVE DIAMOND – FORRESTER MODEL OF THE PATIENT HAVING CHEST PAIN SUSPECTED CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AT HOAN MY CUU LONG GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2020-2021
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) which is a common cardiovascular disease, is the leading cause of death worldwide. Guidelines of CAD give a estimation priori probability model based on reseach: validation, updating, extension of Diamond – Forrester model. Objectives: 1. Determined probability obstructive coronary and related factors; 2. Examined the predictive value obstructive coronary artery of extensive Diamond - Forrester model in the patient having chest pain suspected CAD at Hoan My Cuu Long General Hospital in 2020-2021. Materials and methods: A cross – sectional study with analysis. There are 136 patients having chest pain suspected CAD at Hoan My Cuu Long General Hospital in 2020-2021. Results: From 6/2020 to 4/2021, there were 136 patients having chest pain suspected CAD: 35.3% were male, 64.7% were female; average was 69.86±10.52. The ratio of the patient with significant stenosis coronary artery was 58.8%. There are 4 variables capable of estimating significant obstructive coronary artery: hypertension, diabetes, elevated LDL-c, type of chest pain. The result of the study determines regression equation: Y = -6.317 + 3.074 × (hypertension) + 2.877 × (diabetes) + 2.651 × (elevated LDL-c) + 2.377 × (typical chest pain) with a correct predictive value of 69.9% . Conclusion: An estimation priori probability model which includes hypertension, diabetes, elevated LDL-c, type of chest pain, can predict significant obstructive coronary with patients suspected CAD.
Keywords
Extensive Diamond - Forrester model, significant obstructive coronary artery, chest pain suspected coronary artery disease
Article Details
References
2. Almeida J,Fonseca P, et al. (2016), Comparison of coronary artery disease consortium 1 and 2 scores and duke clinical score to predict obstructive coronary disease by invasive coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol, 39(4), pp.223-8.
3. Baskaran L,Danad I, et al. (2018), A Comparison of the updated Diamond-Forrester, CAD consortium, and CONFIRM history-based risk scores for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain: The SCOT-HEART Coronary CTA Cohort. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 12, pp.1392-1400.
4. Di Carli MF,Gupta A(2019), Estimating Pre-Test Probability of Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 12(7 Pt 2), pp.1401–1404.
5. Ferrannini G,Manca ML, et al. (2020), Coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes: A proteomic study. Diabetes Care, 43, pp.843-851.
6. Genders TSS,Coles A, et al. (2017), Patients with stable chest pain: Insights from the PROMISE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 11(3), pp.437-446.
7. Madhavan MV,Gersh BJ, et al. (2018), Coronary artery disease in patients ≥80 years of age. J Am Coll Cardiol, 71(18), pp.2015-2040.
8. Patsouras A,Farmaki P, et al. (2019), Screening and risk assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: An updated review. In Vivo, 33(4), pp.1039-1049.
9. Weber T,Lang I, et al. (2016), Hypertension and coronary artery disease: epidemiology, physiology, effects of treatment, and recommendations : A joint scientific statement from the Austrian Society of Cardiology and the Austrian Society of Hypertension. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 128(13-14), pp.467-479.
10. Wong ND(2014), Epidemiological studies of CHD and the evolution of preventive cardiology. Nat Rev Cardiol, 11(5), pp.276-289.