EVALUATING THE RESULTS OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT AND SEALING SOCKET ABUTMENT IN MANDIBULAR FIRST MOLAR AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The first molars of the mandibular are one of the first permanent teeth presents on the mouth, so they are also the most susceptible to damage leading to loss in the future. The method of replacing with immediate Implant and sealing socket abutment has almost not been studied in Vietnam. Objectives: To evaluate the results of immediate implant placement and sealing socket abutment in the mandibular first molars. Materials and methods: Case series study over 35 patients who were treated on immediate implant placement and sealing socket abutment in mandibular first molar at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital. Results: Most of the implants used a diameter of 5.5mm, accounting for 62.9%, the remaining 20.0% of 4.5 mm, and 17.1% of 5.0mm. Thread length 11.0 mm rated 82.9%, while the remaining thread lengths 7.0mm, 9.0mm, and 13.0mm. The percentage of the length of the smooth neck was 3.0mm was 85.7%, the rest was 4.0mm. 31 patients have had torque measured at instant insertion ≥ 35 Ncm, the remaining 4<35 Ncm. Only 1 patient (2.9%) with ISQ stability was good, the remaining 77.1% was poor and 20.0% was fair. 8 patients with complications at the time of placement with the rate of 22.9%. Conclusions: The stability of the implant immediately after extraction of the first molar of the lower jaw was not high, it is necessary to continue to monitor more to evaluate the results of treatment.
Article Details
Keywords
immediate implant, primary stability, primary stability by ISQ
References
2. Albrektsson, T. et al (1981), Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 52(2), pp. 155-170.
3. Chu Stephen, J., et al (2012), The dual-zone therapeutic concept of managing immediate implant placement and provisional restoration in anterior extraction sockets. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry, 33 (7), pp. 524-532, 534.
4. Evans Christopher D.J., et al (2008), Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clinical oral implants research, 19 (1), pp. 73-80.
5. Hämmerle, C.H., et al (2004), Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 19 (Suppl), pp. 26-28.
6. Kois John, C. (2001), Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry, 22 (3), pp. 199-206; quiz 208.
7. Lazzara Richard (1989), Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Periodontics Restorative Dent, 9, pp. 332-343.
8. Rosenquist Bo, et al (1996), Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: implant survival. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants, 11 (2), pp.205-209.
9. Schropp Lars, et al (2003). Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. International Journal of Periodontics Restorative Dentistry, 23 (4), pp.313-323.