IDENTIFYING PREOPERATIVE PHYSICAL STATUS AND UNDERLYING DISEASES USING 2019 AMENDED ASA-PS CLASSIFICATION

Le Linh Vu1,2,, Phan Kim Hue1, Pham Kieu Anh Tho1, Nguyen Anh Duy2, Lam Kim Tuyen1, Vo Nguyen Hong Phuc1,2
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Background: ASA classification has been applied all over the world in premedication. The 2019 Amended ASA-PS was modified by new definitions, approved examples, especially definition for emergent patients. In Vietnam, there has not any independent study on ASA- PS classification up to now. The addition of “E” denotes emergency surgery. Objectives: To determine the ratio of patients in each ASA class, their underlying diseases and complications that might happen intraoperative as well as postoperative. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at Anesthesiology Department of Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from January 2021 to December 2021, the sample size was ≥ 420, and the sampling method was convenience sampling. The sample included 528 patients of both emergent and elective operations included. Results:  The ratios of ASA were I (39.21%), II (33.52%), III (17.42%), IE (6.06%), IIE (3.03%) and IIIE (0.76%). None of the cases was classified as ASA IV/IVE, V/VE or VI. The most common patients’ health conditions were social alcohol drinkers and current smokers. The most popular underlying diseases were diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, CAD, mild respiratory diseases (history of asthma or mycobacterium tuberculosis) and COPD. Conclusions: The result showed that patients who came for operations were classified from ASA I to ASA III, IE to IIIE. The ASA I group was the most common. Patients might have more than one health condition or underlying diseases. The intraoperative complications belonged to cardiovascular diseases and respiratory diseases, they were all cured and there was no need for intensive care.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS (2019). A review of ASA physical status historical perspectives and modern developments. Anesthesia 2019; 74:373-379
2. Hurwitz EE, Simon M, Vinta SR, et al (2017). Adding Examples to the ASA-Physical Status Classification Improves Correct Assignment to Patients. Anesthesiology 2017; 126(4):614-622
3. Abouleish AE, Vinta SR, Shabot SM, et al (2020). Improving agreement of ASA physical status class between pre-anesthesia screening and day of surgery by adding institutional-specific and ASA-approved examples: a quality improvement project. Perioperative Medicine (2020); 9(1):34
4. Irita K, Kawashima Y, Tsuzaki K, et al (2002). Perioperative mortality and morbidity in the year 2000 in 502 Japanese certified anesthesia-training hospitals: with a special reference to ASAphysical status--report of the Japan Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating Room Safety. Masui 2002; 51(1):71-85.
5. Miller RD (2019), Miller's Anesthesia, ninth edition. Vol. 1,2: Elsevier.
6. American Diabetes Association (2021), Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care, 44 (Suppl 1): S15-S33.
7. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. (2014), Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Report from the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA, 311(5):507-520.