PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CENTRAL VENOUS–ARTERIAL CARBON DIOXIDE PARTIAL PRESSURE DIFFERENCE AND LACTATE CLEARANCE IN SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS

Thi Cam Hong Le1, , Minh Phuong Vo2, Thanh Bich Thao Nguyen1
1 Can Tho General Hospital
2 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: In septic shock resuscitation, the assessment of tissue perfusion and early prognostication remains challenging. Therefore, determining the prognostic value of the central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (ΔPCO₂) and lactate clearance may help optimize hemodynamic monitoring and guide therapeutic strategies. Objectives: To determine the prognostic value of ΔPCO₂ and lactate clearance in patients with septic shock. Materials and methods:  A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 47 patients aged ≥ 16 years diagnosed with septic shock according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) 2016 criteria. ΔPCO₂ was defined as the difference between central venous PCO₂ and arterial PCO₂ measured simultaneously. Demographic characteristics, source of infection, SOFA score, APACHE II score, norepinephrine dose, mechanical ventilation status, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. ΔPCO₂ and lactate clearance were assessed at diagnosis (T0), after 6 hours (T6), and after 12 hours (T12) of resuscitation. Results: Among the 47 enrolled patients, the in-hospital mortality rate was 55.3%. Patients who died had significantly higher ΔPCO₂ values at all three time points compared with survivors. Similarly, lactate clearance was significantly higher in survivors than in nonsurvivors at both T6 and T12 (p<0.001). ΔPCO₂ at T0 and T6 demonstrated good prognostic performance for in-hospital mortality, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75–0.97 and 0.74–0.98, respectively). Lactate clearance at T12 showed the best prognostic performance, with an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84–1.00). Conclusions: ΔPCO₂ and lactate clearance during the first 12 hours of resuscitation showed good prognostic value for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock. 

Article Details

References

1. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2021. 47(11), 1181-1247, DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007075.
2. Tijana Srdić, et al. From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Therapy: Understanding SepsisInduced Multiple Organ Dysfunction. International journal of molecular sciences. 2024. 25(14), 7770, DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147770.
3. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016. 315(8), 801-810, doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
4. Nuala J. Meyer and Hallie C. Prescott. Sepsis and Septic Shock. The New England journal of medicine. 2024. 391(22), 2133-2146, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra2403213.
5. R. S. Loomba et al. Veno-Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide Difference as a Metric of Systemic Oxygen Delivery: Insights from a Correlative Meta-Analysis. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2024. 13(4), 372-378, DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743501.
6. Kriswidyatomo P, et al. Prognostic value of PCO2 gap in adult septic shock patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022. 50(5):324-331. DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2021.21139.
7. J. Mallat et al. Use of CO (2)-derived variables in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2025.15(1). 142. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-025-01569-2.
8. Kavya Sindhu, et al. Correlation of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-central venous oxygen difference ratio to lactate clearance and prognosis in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational cohort study. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2022. 12, 146-154, DOI: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22.
9. Châu Hận, Võ Minh Phương, Dương Phước Đông. Giá trị tiên lượng tử vong của sự thay đổi nồng độ procalcitonin, lactate huyết thanh, điểm apache ii, sofa ở bệnh nhân sốc nhiễm khuẩn tại bệnh viện đa khoa tỉnh kiên giang năm 2023-2024. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024. 542(1), 10.51298/vmj.v542i1.11010.
10. Đoàn Đức Nhân, Danh Minh Sung, Võ Minh Phương, Nguyễn Việt Thu Trang, và Danh Thái Châu. Vai trò của độ thanh thải lactate trong tiên lượng tử vong ở bệnh nhân sốc nhiễm khuẩn. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2023. 69, 106-112, 10.58490/ctump.2023i69.1966.
11. Tạ Thị Diệu Ngân và Huỳnh Thị Thảo.Tỷ lệ tử vong và một số yếu tố liên quan đến thời gian tử vong ở bệnh nhân sốc nhiễm khuẩn. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 2024. 182(9), 127-135, https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v182i9.2652.
12. S. A. Getu et al. Mortality due to Sepsis and Its Associated Factors Among Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units of Southern Amhara Public Hospitals, Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int. 2024. 4378635. DOI: 10.1155/2024/4378635.
13. Son Ngoc Do et al. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2023. 13(3). e064870. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064870.
14. Vũ Đình Phú, Thân Mạnh Hùng. Đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và căn nguyên gây sốc nhiễm khuẩn tại bệnh viện bệnh nhiệt đới trung ương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024. 96-99, 10.51298/vmj.v535i1.8355.