ETIOLOGY, CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS, AND RELATED FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH FACIAL ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS UNDERGOING TREATMENT AT THE AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF CAN THO DERMATO-VENEREOLOGY HOSPITAL IN 2024

Pham Thi Bao Tram1, , Truong Dieu Hien2, Huynh Van Ba1, Nguyen Thuy Thao My1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Can Tho Hospital of Dermato-Venereology

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Background: In recent years, facial allergic contact dermatitis, particularly those due to cosmetics, has become increasingly common. A study conducted in Denmark in 2021 revealed that 30.6% of cases of facial contact dermatitis were caused by cosmetics. Identifying the triggers, clinical features, and related factors of facial allergic contact dermatitis may help clinicians manage the condition more effectively. Objectives: 1) To determine the rate of triggers and clinical features among the patients; 2) To describe some related factors affecting patients with facial allergic contact dermatitis treated at the Aesthetic Dermatology Department of Can Tho Dermato- Venereology Hospital in 2024. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study analyzed in 81 patients with facial contact dermatitis visited the Aesthetic Dermatology Department of Can Tho Dermato-Venereology Hospital in 2024. Results: 95.1% of patients had facial contact dermatitis caused by cosmetics. Itching was the reason for 98.8% of the hospital visits. Most clinical manifestations included erythema (92.6%) and dry skin/crusts (67.9%). Lesions on the cheeks were observed in 98.8% of cases, and 69.1% of patients had mild facial contact dermatitis. Higher rates of moderate to severe facial contact dermatitis were found in groups such as those aged 60 and older (100%), farmers (100%), homemakers (48.1%), chefs/bartenders (40%), and those with a past medical history of previous skin diseases (64.7%). Conclusion: Among 81 patients studied, 95.1% of them had facial contact dermatitis caused by cosmetics, and 98.8% came to the hospital because of itching. Related factors of the severity of the condition included age, occupation, and a past medical history of previous skin diseases.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Bruusgaard-Mouritsen MA, Garvey LH, Johansen JD. Facial contact dermatitis caused by cosmeticrelevant allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2021. 85(6), 650-659. doi: 10.1111/cod.13966.
2. Mowad CM, Anderson B, Scheinman P, Pootongkam S, Nedorost S, Brod B. Allergic contact dermatitis: Patient diagnosis and evaluation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016. 74(6), 1029-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1139.
3. Ministry of Health. Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of dermatological diseases. Issued together with Decision No. 4416/QD-BYT dated December 6, 2023.
4. Kasemsarn P, Iamphonrat T, Boonchai W. Risk factors and common contact allergens in facial allergic contact dermatitis patients. Int J Dermatol. 2016. 55(4), 417-24. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12880.
5. Alluhayyan OB, Alshahri BK, Farhat AM, Alsugair S, Siddiqui JJ, Alghabawy K, AlQefari GB, Alolayan WO, Abu Hashem IA. Occupational-Related Contact Dermatitis: Prevalence and Risk Factors Among Healthcare Workers in the Al'Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cureus. 2020.12(10), e10975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10975.
6. Dararattanaroj W, Pootongkam S, Rojanawatsirivej N, Liwsrisakun C, Wongpiyabovorn J. Patterns and risk factors of causative contact allergens in Thai adult patients with contact dermatitis at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2017. 35, 27-32.
7. UpToDate. Clinical features and diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://medilib.ir/uptodate/show/13655.
8. Czarnobilska E, Obtulowicz K, Dyga W, Wsolek-Wnek K, Spiewak R. Contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis among school children and teenagers with eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 2009. 60(5), 264-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01537.x.
9. Silverberg JI, Hou A, Warshaw EM, DeKoven JG, Maibach HI, Belsito DV, Taylor JS, Zug KA, Sasseville D, Fransway AF, DeLeo VA, Pratt MD, Reeder MJ, Fowler JF Jr, Zirwas MJ, Marks JG Jr, Atwater AR. Prevalence and Trend of Allergen Sensitization in Adults and Children with Atopic Dermatitis Referred for Patch Testing, North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001-2016. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021. 9(7), 2853-2866.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.028.
10. Bourke J, Coulson I, English J; British Association of Dermatologists. Guidelines for care of contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2001. 145(6), 877-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04499.x.
11. Kang SY, Chung BY, Kim JC, Park CW, Kim HO. Clinical manifestations and patch test results for facial dermatitis associated with disposable face mask use during the COVID-19 outbreak: A case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021. 85(3), 719.
12. Verma KK, Manchanda Y, Dwivedi SN. Failure of titer of contact hypersensitivity to correlate with clinical severity and therapeutic response in contact dermatitis caused by parthenium. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2004. 70(4), 210-3.
13. Sharma VK, Asati DP. Pediatric contact dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010. 76(5), 514-20. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.69070.
14. Prakash AV, Davis MD. Contact dermatitis in older adults: a review of the literature. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010.11(6), 373-81. doi: 10.2165/11319290-000000000-00000.
15. Bangash HK, Petronic-Rosic V. Acral manifestations of contact dermatitis. Clin Dermatol. 2017. 35(1), 9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2016.09.003.