Thanh bên bài viết
Ngày xuất bản:
06/11/2023
Ngày xuất bản Online:
06/11/2023
Số lượt xem tóm tắt: 85
Số lượt xem PDF: 89
Số lượt xem PDF: 89
Số xuất bản
Chuyên mục
Bài báo
Trích dẫn bài báo
Đổ, N. C., & Nguyễn, V. Đ. (2023). KỸ THUẬT SINH THIẾT PHỔI XUYÊN THÀNH NGỰC DƯỚI HƯỚNG DẪN CỦA CẮT LỚP VI TÍNH. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ, 67, 114-123. https://doi.org/10.58490/ctump.2023i67.2189
KỸ THUẬT SINH THIẾT PHỔI XUYÊN THÀNH NGỰC DƯỚI HƯỚNG DẪN CỦA CẮT LỚP VI TÍNH
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Sinh thiết phổi xuyên thành ngực dưới hướng dẫn chụp cắt lớp vi tính là một công cụ không thể thiếu trong việc đánh giá các bất thường ở phổi do độ chính xác chẩn đoán cao trong việc phát hiện khối u ác tính. Sinh thiết phổi xuyên thành ngực đóng một vai trò quan trọng trong việc thu được bằng chứng bệnh ác tính, hướng dẫn xác định giai đoạn và lập kế hoạch điều trị. Bài viết nêu lên tổng quan, hiệu quả và biến chứng liên quan của kỹ thuật sinh thiết này.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
Sinh thiết phổi, cắt lớp vi tính, u phổi
Tài liệu tham khảo
1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R. L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021. 71(3), 209-249, doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.
2. Nakamura K., Matsumoto K., Inoue C., Matsusue E. and Fujii S. Computed Tomographyguided Lung Biopsy: A Review of Techniques for Reducing the Incidence of Complications. Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan). 2021. 6(3), 83-92, doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2021-0012.
3. Graver L. P. and Binkley J. S. Aspiration biopsy of tumors of the lung. Journal of Thoracic Surgery. 1939. 8(4), 436-463, doi: 10.1016/S0096-5588(20)32086-9.
4. Craver L. F. Diagnosis of malignant lung tumors by aspiration biopsy and by sputum examination. Surgery. 1940. 8(6), 947-960.
5. Tripoli C. J. and Holland L. F. Carcinoma of the lung: Analysis of 195 cases with special note on needle puncture biopsy. South Medical Journal. 1940. 33, 559-565.
6. Dutra F. R. and Geraci C. L. Needle biopsy of the lung. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1954. 155(1), 21-24, doi: 10.1001/jama.1954.03690190027008.
7. Youmans C. R. Jr., De Groot W. J., Marshall R., Morettin L. B. and Derrick J. R. Needle biopsy of the lung in diffuse parenchymal disease An analysis of 151 cases. Annals of Surgery. 1970. 120(5), 637-643, doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(70)80184-2.
8. Zavala D. C. and Bedell G. N. Percutaneous lung biopsy with a cutting needle. An analysis of 40 cases and comparison with other biopsy techniques. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1972. 106(2), 186-193, doi: 10.1164/arrd.1972.106.2.186.
9. Haaga J. R. and Alfidi R. J. Precise biopsy localization by computer tomography. Radiology. 1976. 118(3), 603-607, doi: 10.1148/118.3.603.
10. Otani H., Toyooka S., Soh J., Yamamoto H., Suehisa H., et al. Detection of EGFR gene mutations using the wash fluid of CT-guided biopsy needle in NSCLC patients. Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. 2008. 3(5), 472-476, doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31816de2cd.
11. Smouse J. H., Cibas E. S., Jänne P. A., Joshi V. A., Zou K. H., et al. EGFR mutations are detected comparably in cytologic and surgical pathology specimens of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2009. 117(1), 67-72, doi: 10.1002/cncy.20011.
12. Manhire A., Charig M., Clelland C., Gleeson F., Miller R., et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 2003. 58(11), 920-936, doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920.
13. Aktaş A. R., Gözlek E., Yılmaz Ö., Kayan M., Ünlü N., et al. CT-guided transthoracic biopsy:
histopathologic results and complication rates. Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey). 2015. 21(1), 67-70, doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.140140.
14. Malloy P. C., Grassi C. J., Kundu S., Gervais D. A., Miller D. L., et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR. 2009. 20(7 Suppl), S240-249, doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.11.027.
15. Wu C. C., Maher M. M. and Shepard J. A. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest:
preprocedural evaluation and technique. American Journal of Radiology. 2011. 196(5), W511W514, doi: 10.2214/ajr.10.4657.
16. Winokur R. S., Pua B. B., Sullivan B. W. and Madoff D. C. Percutaneous lung biopsy:
technique, efficacy, and complications. Seminars in Interventional Radiology. 2013. 30(2), 121-127, doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1342952.
17. Kim G. R., Hur J., Lee S. M., Lee H. J., Hong Y. J., et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol. 2011. 21(2), 232-239, doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1936-y.
18. Prosch H., Stadler A., Schilling M., Bürklin S., Eisenhuber E., et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided vs. multislice CT biopsy mode-guided lung biopsies: accuracy, complications and radiation dose. European journal of radiology. 2012. 81(5), 1029-1033, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.064.
19. Gupta S. and Madoff D. C. Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cancer diagnosis and staging.
Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology. 2007. 10(2), 88-101, doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2007.09.005.
20. Lal H., Neyaz Z., Nath A. and Borah S. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of intrathoracic lesions. Korean journal of radiology. 2012. 13(2), 210-226, doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.210.
21. Richardson C. M., Pointon K. S., Manhire A. R. and Macfarlane J. T. Percutaneous lung biopsies: a survey of UK practice based on 5444 biopsies. The British journal of radiology. 2002. 75(897), 731-735, doi: 10.1259/bjr.75.897.750731.
22. Tomiyama N., Yasuhara Y., Nakajima Y., Adachi S., Arai Y., et al. CT-guided needle biopsy of lung lesions: a survey of severe complication based on 9783 biopsies in Japan. European journal of radiology. 2006. 59(1), 60-64, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.02.001.
23. Yamagami T., Iida S., Kato T., Tanaka O., Toda S., et al. Usefulness of new automated cutting needle for tissue-core biopsy of lung nodules under CT fluoroscopic guidance. Chest. 2003. 124(1), 147-154, doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.147.
24. Mendiratta-Lala M., Sheiman R., Brook O. R., Gourtsoyianni S., Mahadevan A., et al. CTguided core biopsy and percutaneous fiducial seed placement in the lung: can these procedures be combined without an increase in complication rate or decrease in technical success? European journal of radiology. 2014. 83(4), 720-725, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.01.006.
25. Kakizawa H., Toyota N., Hieda M., Hirai N., Tachikake T., et al. Risk factors for severity of pneumothorax after CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy using the single-needle method. Hiroshima journal of medical sciences. 2010. 59(3), 43-50.
26. Loh S. E., Wu D. D., Venkatesh S. K., Ong C. K., Liu E., et al. CT-guided thoracic biopsy: evaluating diagnostic yield and complications. Annals of the Academy of Medicine. 2013. 42(6), 285-290.
27. Choi C. M., Um S. W., Yoo C. G., Kim Y. W., Han S. K., et al. Incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung. Chest. 2004. 126(5), 15161521, doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1516.
28. Taleb S., Jalaeian H., Frank N., Golzarian J. and D'Souza D. Is a Routine Chest X-ray Necessary in Every Patient After Percutaneous CT-Guided Lung Biopsy? A Retrospective Review of 278 Cases. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2017. 40(9), 1415-1420, doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1632-2.
29. Lorenz J. and Blum M. Complications of percutaneous chest biopsy. Seminars in interventional radiology. 2006. 23(2), 188-193, doi: 10.1055/s-2006-941449.
2. Nakamura K., Matsumoto K., Inoue C., Matsusue E. and Fujii S. Computed Tomographyguided Lung Biopsy: A Review of Techniques for Reducing the Incidence of Complications. Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan). 2021. 6(3), 83-92, doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2021-0012.
3. Graver L. P. and Binkley J. S. Aspiration biopsy of tumors of the lung. Journal of Thoracic Surgery. 1939. 8(4), 436-463, doi: 10.1016/S0096-5588(20)32086-9.
4. Craver L. F. Diagnosis of malignant lung tumors by aspiration biopsy and by sputum examination. Surgery. 1940. 8(6), 947-960.
5. Tripoli C. J. and Holland L. F. Carcinoma of the lung: Analysis of 195 cases with special note on needle puncture biopsy. South Medical Journal. 1940. 33, 559-565.
6. Dutra F. R. and Geraci C. L. Needle biopsy of the lung. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1954. 155(1), 21-24, doi: 10.1001/jama.1954.03690190027008.
7. Youmans C. R. Jr., De Groot W. J., Marshall R., Morettin L. B. and Derrick J. R. Needle biopsy of the lung in diffuse parenchymal disease An analysis of 151 cases. Annals of Surgery. 1970. 120(5), 637-643, doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(70)80184-2.
8. Zavala D. C. and Bedell G. N. Percutaneous lung biopsy with a cutting needle. An analysis of 40 cases and comparison with other biopsy techniques. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1972. 106(2), 186-193, doi: 10.1164/arrd.1972.106.2.186.
9. Haaga J. R. and Alfidi R. J. Precise biopsy localization by computer tomography. Radiology. 1976. 118(3), 603-607, doi: 10.1148/118.3.603.
10. Otani H., Toyooka S., Soh J., Yamamoto H., Suehisa H., et al. Detection of EGFR gene mutations using the wash fluid of CT-guided biopsy needle in NSCLC patients. Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. 2008. 3(5), 472-476, doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31816de2cd.
11. Smouse J. H., Cibas E. S., Jänne P. A., Joshi V. A., Zou K. H., et al. EGFR mutations are detected comparably in cytologic and surgical pathology specimens of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2009. 117(1), 67-72, doi: 10.1002/cncy.20011.
12. Manhire A., Charig M., Clelland C., Gleeson F., Miller R., et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 2003. 58(11), 920-936, doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920.
13. Aktaş A. R., Gözlek E., Yılmaz Ö., Kayan M., Ünlü N., et al. CT-guided transthoracic biopsy:
histopathologic results and complication rates. Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey). 2015. 21(1), 67-70, doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.140140.
14. Malloy P. C., Grassi C. J., Kundu S., Gervais D. A., Miller D. L., et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR. 2009. 20(7 Suppl), S240-249, doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.11.027.
15. Wu C. C., Maher M. M. and Shepard J. A. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest:
preprocedural evaluation and technique. American Journal of Radiology. 2011. 196(5), W511W514, doi: 10.2214/ajr.10.4657.
16. Winokur R. S., Pua B. B., Sullivan B. W. and Madoff D. C. Percutaneous lung biopsy:
technique, efficacy, and complications. Seminars in Interventional Radiology. 2013. 30(2), 121-127, doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1342952.
17. Kim G. R., Hur J., Lee S. M., Lee H. J., Hong Y. J., et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol. 2011. 21(2), 232-239, doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1936-y.
18. Prosch H., Stadler A., Schilling M., Bürklin S., Eisenhuber E., et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided vs. multislice CT biopsy mode-guided lung biopsies: accuracy, complications and radiation dose. European journal of radiology. 2012. 81(5), 1029-1033, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.064.
19. Gupta S. and Madoff D. C. Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cancer diagnosis and staging.
Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology. 2007. 10(2), 88-101, doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2007.09.005.
20. Lal H., Neyaz Z., Nath A. and Borah S. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of intrathoracic lesions. Korean journal of radiology. 2012. 13(2), 210-226, doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.210.
21. Richardson C. M., Pointon K. S., Manhire A. R. and Macfarlane J. T. Percutaneous lung biopsies: a survey of UK practice based on 5444 biopsies. The British journal of radiology. 2002. 75(897), 731-735, doi: 10.1259/bjr.75.897.750731.
22. Tomiyama N., Yasuhara Y., Nakajima Y., Adachi S., Arai Y., et al. CT-guided needle biopsy of lung lesions: a survey of severe complication based on 9783 biopsies in Japan. European journal of radiology. 2006. 59(1), 60-64, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.02.001.
23. Yamagami T., Iida S., Kato T., Tanaka O., Toda S., et al. Usefulness of new automated cutting needle for tissue-core biopsy of lung nodules under CT fluoroscopic guidance. Chest. 2003. 124(1), 147-154, doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.147.
24. Mendiratta-Lala M., Sheiman R., Brook O. R., Gourtsoyianni S., Mahadevan A., et al. CTguided core biopsy and percutaneous fiducial seed placement in the lung: can these procedures be combined without an increase in complication rate or decrease in technical success? European journal of radiology. 2014. 83(4), 720-725, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.01.006.
25. Kakizawa H., Toyota N., Hieda M., Hirai N., Tachikake T., et al. Risk factors for severity of pneumothorax after CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy using the single-needle method. Hiroshima journal of medical sciences. 2010. 59(3), 43-50.
26. Loh S. E., Wu D. D., Venkatesh S. K., Ong C. K., Liu E., et al. CT-guided thoracic biopsy: evaluating diagnostic yield and complications. Annals of the Academy of Medicine. 2013. 42(6), 285-290.
27. Choi C. M., Um S. W., Yoo C. G., Kim Y. W., Han S. K., et al. Incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung. Chest. 2004. 126(5), 15161521, doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1516.
28. Taleb S., Jalaeian H., Frank N., Golzarian J. and D'Souza D. Is a Routine Chest X-ray Necessary in Every Patient After Percutaneous CT-Guided Lung Biopsy? A Retrospective Review of 278 Cases. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2017. 40(9), 1415-1420, doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1632-2.
29. Lorenz J. and Blum M. Complications of percutaneous chest biopsy. Seminars in interventional radiology. 2006. 23(2), 188-193, doi: 10.1055/s-2006-941449.